Planning applications


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Nottingham City Council (23 002 442)

    Statement Upheld Planning applications 20-May-2025

    Summary: Mr X complained on behalf of his client, a manufacturing business. Mr X said the Council gave planning consent for a housing development next to his client’s factory without adequately considering how to prevent noise from the factory causing a statutory nuisance to the occupiers of the new housing. We found the Council at fault for how it approved a planning condition designed to protect occupiers of the new houses from the noise of the factory. But we could not say this failing would have resulted in a different outcome for Mr X’s client. However, the fault still caused uncertainty which we consider a form of distress. The Council has accepted these findings and agreed to apologise to Mr X’s client and improve its service to prevent a repeat.

  • Northumberland County Council (25 002 846)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 20-May-2025

    Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about a planning matter because it has been made by a parish council. We cannot investigate complaints made by public bodies.

  • London Borough of Camden (24 009 653)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 19-May-2025

    Summary: Mr C complained on behalf of a resident’s association about how the Council dealt with a planning application for works to a wall and balustrades. He said this result in the loss of several mature trees and impact residential amenity and the local environment. We found no fault in the way the Council considered the planning application and the objections it received. It therefore reached a decision it was entitled to make.

  • Isle of Wight Council (24 021 898)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 19-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of a planning application and related planning enforcement issues. There is insufficient evidence that any fault in the determination of the application has affected the outcome. The complainant’s concerns about the handling of the planning enforcement issues are premature, as they have not been considered under the Council’s complaints procedure.

  • Cheshire East Council (24 022 618)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 19-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with an application for a certificate of lawfulness of proposed use or development. This is because we are unlikely to find fault and the complainant has not suffered significant injustice.

  • Rushcliffe Borough Council (25 000 387)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 19-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s refusal to grant planning permission. It is reasonable to expect him to appeal.

  • Melton Borough Council (25 001 948)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 19-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about comments published on the Council’s website about a planning application. This is because we are unlikely to find fault.

  • Winchester City Council (24 022 012)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 18-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council considered a planning application. We have not seen enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions to justify an investigation.

  • East Suffolk Council (24 020 871)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 18-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because we are unlikely to find fault.

  • London Borough of Sutton (24 021 610)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 14-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council decided to approve a planning application for a new property close to the complainant’s home. We have not seen enough evidence of fault in the decision-making process to justify an investigation. Also, we cannot achieve the outcome the complainant is seeking.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings