Recent statements in this category are shown below:
-
Broxbourne Borough Council (25 019 186)
Statement Upheld Planning applications 29-Sep-2026
Summary: Mrs X complained about the Council’s decision to approve a planning application for her neighbour’s extension. The Council accepted it was at fault for failing to consider loss of amenity between relevant windows, impacting on her privacy significantly. It proposed a way to put things right. We considered the Council’s offer as appropriate to remedy Mrs X’s injustice in these circumstances. We did not make further recommendations.
-
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 29-Sep-2026
Summary: Ms X complains about the Council’s handling of a planning application of land which she attends regularly. Ms X says the Council failed to consider the importance of the land and the impact the development will have on wildlife. Ms X is also unhappy the application was decided by an officer rather than at panel. We have not found fault in the actions of the Council.
-
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 29-Sep-2026
Summary: Mrs X complains about the Council’s handling of a planning application of land which she attends regularly. Mrs X says the Council failed to consider the importance of the land and the impact the development will have on wildlife. Mrs X is also unhappy the application was decided by an officer rather than at panel. We have not found fault in the actions of the Council.
-
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 29-Sep-2026
Summary: Mrs X complains about the Council’s handling of a planning application of land which she attends regularly. Mrs X says the Council failed to consider the importance of the land and the impact the development will have on wildlife. Mrs X is also unhappy the application was decided by an officer rather than at panel. We have not found fault in the actions of the Council.
-
City of Wolverhampton Council (25 028 347)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 29-Sep-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to approve a planning application. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.
-
Torridge District Council (25 029 175)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 29-Sep-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to grant planning permission. This is because parts of the complaint are late and for the remainder there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.
-
Fenland District Council (25 031 952)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 29-Sep-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council considered a planning application. The complaint is historic and Mr X could have approached us within 12 months of becoming aware of the matter.
-
Stratford-on-Avon District Council (25 028 474)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 28-Sep-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about how the Council handled its planning decisions. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision to justify our involvement.
-
Halton Borough Council (25 008 825)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 24-Sep-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council considered a planning application. We have not seen enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.
-
Redcar & Cleveland Council (25 027 058)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 24-Sep-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council dealt with a planning application. We have not seen enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions to justify an investigation. And we do not consider the injustice claimed by Miss X is not significant enough to justify our involvement