Recent statements in this category are shown below:
-
Mid Suffolk District Council (24 020 433)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 25-Nov-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because part of the complaint is late. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s enforcement of planning conditions to justify our involvement.
-
Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council (25 006 119)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 25-Nov-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council granting planning permission for a development which the complainant says encroaches onto his property. There is insufficient evidence that fault by the Council has directly caused a significant injustice to the complainant.
-
Suffolk County Council (25 009 022)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 25-Nov-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about communication delays. There is insufficient injustice caused by the delay to warrant further investigation.
-
High Peak Borough Council (25 010 622)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 25-Nov-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council allowing a café to open on bank holidays as a non-material amendment to a planning permission. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council or injustice to Ms X to warrant investigation by us.
-
Buckinghamshire Council (25 008 472)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 24-Nov-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Mr X’s planning applications. This is because Mr X had a right of appeal to the Planning Inspectorate which it would have been reasonable for him to use.
-
Wealden District Council (25 013 098)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 24-Nov-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s refusal to waive Community Interest Levy interest charges. We have not seen sufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s actions. Also, we cannot achieve the outcome Miss X wants.
-
South Norfolk District Council (24 021 404)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 21-Nov-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X and Mrs Y’s complaint about the Council’s decision to grant planning permission for a development near their homes. The complaint is late and there are no good reasons why the complainants could not have brought their concerns to us sooner.
-
Tandridge District Council (25 012 190)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 21-Nov-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about how the Council dealt with his planning application. This is because he had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector.
-
West Lindsey District Council (25 008 579)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 21-Nov-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application and the pre-application planning advice it provided. This is because the complainant has appealed to the Planning Inspector. It is unlikely we would find fault in relation to the remaining issues complained about.
-
Broxbourne Borough Council (25 008 585)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 21-Nov-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council has dealt with the complainant’s planning applications. This is because the complaint is late. The complainant also had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector.