Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Planning applications


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Buckinghamshire Council (21 018 858)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 10-May-2022

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council's decision to grant planning permission for a development near his property. He also complained about the Council's planning enforcement investigation. He said the development negatively impacted his amenity. We did not find fault with the Council.

  • Buckinghamshire Council (22 000 980)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 08-May-2022

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council's decision to grant planning permission for a development near his property. He also complained about the Council's planning enforcement investigation. He said the development negatively impacted his amenity. We did not find fault with the Council.

  • Buckinghamshire Council (21 010 630)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 08-May-2022

    Summary: Mr X complained on behalf of Mr Y about the Council's decision to grant planning permission for a development near his property. He also complained about the Council's planning enforcement investigation. He said the development negatively impacted his amenity. We did not find fault with the Council.

  • Bristol City Council (21 012 543)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 05-May-2022

    Summary: Mr X complained, on behalf of Ms T, about how the Council granted planning permission for a development near her home. Based on the information we have seen, there was no fault in how the Council decided the planning application, approved the construction management plan or investigated the developer's compliance with the plan.

  • Bristol City Council (21 012 538)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 05-May-2022

    Summary: Mr X complained, on behalf of Ms R, about how the Council granted planning permission for a development near her home. There was no fault in how the Council decided the planning application, approved the construction management plan or investigated the developer's compliance with the plan.

  • Bristol City Council (21 012 537)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 05-May-2022

    Summary: Mr X complained, on behalf of Mr S, about how the Council granted planning permission for a development near his home. There was no fault in how the Council decided the planning application, approved the construction management plan or investigated the developer's compliance with the plan.

  • Bristol City Council (21 012 394)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 05-May-2022

    Summary: Mr X complained, on behalf of Mrs P, about how the Council granted planning permission for a development near her home. There was no fault in how the Council decided the planning application, approved the construction management plan or investigated the developer's compliance with the plan.

  • Bristol City Council (21 012 544)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 05-May-2022

    Summary: Mr X complained, on behalf of Mrs Q, about how the Council granted planning permission for a development near her home. There was no fault in how the Council decided the planning application, approved the construction management plan or investigated the developer's compliance with the plan.

  • Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council (20 014 350)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 04-May-2022

    Summary: Mr C complains the Council failed to properly consider a reserved matters application for a development next to an area of Ancient Woodland without ensuring adequate protection to prevent harm. We have found no fault by the Council.

  • Winchester City Council (21 007 236)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 02-May-2022

    Summary: There was no fault by the Council in a complaint that alleged there was flawed and unjust treatment of planning applications by the Council and no effective enforcement against material planning breaches at the same property.