Other


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Woking Borough Council (26 001 328)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 07-Sep-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint alleging the Council demolished his access driveway by mistake. This is because the complaint has been made late and there are no good reasons to investigate now.

  • Rushcliffe Borough Council (25 027 192)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 06-Sep-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of a Certificate of Lawfulness application. There is not enough evidence of fault to warrant investigation.

  • Eastbourne Borough Council (25 009 453)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 02-Sep-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of a planning application because there is not enough evidence of fault.

  • Swindon Borough Council (25 028 457)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 31-Aug-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a planning officer’s report. The claimed injustice is not significant enough to warrant investigation.

  • Bolsover District Council (25 026 663)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 20-Aug-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate X’s complaint that the Council defamed them. We cannot determine whether the Council defamed X or should pay compensation. These are matters for the courts.

  • Wiltshire Council (25 026 207)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 19-Aug-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint the Council allowed inappropriate comments to be published on its planning portal. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

  • London Borough of Merton (25 027 360)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 19-Aug-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision about a Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). It would have been reasonable for Mr X to appeal the decision to the Valuation Office Agency (VOA).

  • South Holland District Council (25 025 775)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 18-Aug-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s failure to tell him about the reserved status of his land. We have not seen enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions. Also, we cannot achieve the outcome he is seeking. And it is reasonable to expect Mr X to ask the courts to decide if the Council is liable for financial costs.

  • London Borough of Newham (25 026 039)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 18-Aug-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Councils refusal to act in what it considers a civil matter and not a planning matter. The complaint is late.

  • Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority (25 025 624)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 13-Aug-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Authority’s decision to approve a planning application. We have not seen enough evidence of fault in the way the Council considered the application.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings