Recent statements in this category are shown below:
-
Shropshire Council (25 010 087)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 11-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about that the Council labelled X as vexatious. This is because any injustice is not significant enough to warrant our further involvement.
-
London Borough of Haringey (25 029 570)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 11-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about incorrect information and signposting about support services. Any injustice he experienced is not significant enough to justify our involvement.
-
Derbyshire County Council (26 000 862)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 11-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of a request for information. This is because the Information Commissioner is better placed to consider it.
-
London Borough of Haringey (26 007 666)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 11-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how Mr X’s reasonable adjustments were considered. There is not enough evidence of fault in how the Council considered Mr X’s request.
-
London Borough of Bexley (26 013 204)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 11-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of an information request. This is because there is another body better placed to consider Miss X’s complaint about that matter. Nor will we consider a complaint about how the Council responded to concerns about Miss X, when she was a child. It would be reasonable to allow the Council to investigate Miss X’s complaint about those matters.
-
Birmingham City Council (25 027 027)
Statement Upheld Other 09-Aug-2026
Summary: We have upheld Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of a grave deed transfer. The Council transferred ownership despite knowing not all siblings with equal entitlement had agreed and later reversed that decision. This caused Mrs X avoidable distress, uncertainty, and time and trouble. The Council also did not properly deal with her complaint. The Council has agreed to apologise and make a payment of £200 to remedy the injustice caused.
-
Dacorum Borough Council (25 029 163)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 09-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Mr X’s parking space. There is not significant enough remaining injustice to warrant investigation.
-
Staffordshire Police and Crime Commissioner (25 031 141)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 09-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about complaint-handling. There is not significant enough injustice to warrant investigation.
-
London Borough of Islington (26 013 396)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 06-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to pay a compensation payment. The complaint is late and there are no good reasons for us to exercise discretion to consider it now.
-
Westminster City Council (26 012 685)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 05-Aug-2026
Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to a cyber security incident, including the information it provides to residents and its approach to data security. This is because the Council’s response is a matter that affects all or most of the people in its area. Nor will I investigate a complaint about the Council issuing X with a notice it may restrict their ability to communicate with it. There is no significant injustice.