Recent statements in this category are shown below:
-
London Borough of Wandsworth (25 030 625)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 25-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council did not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about its decision to display a flag. This is because Mrs X has not been caused a significant enough injustice to justify our involvement.
-
Salford City Council (26 014 351)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 25-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about data the Council holds about Miss X, or how it responded to her request for a copy of her data. The Information Commissioner’s Office would be best placed to consider this complaint.
-
Wiltshire Council (26 015 474)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 25-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint about the Council’s oversight of decisions relating to the use of a Council-owned building. This is because we have decided the alleged fault has not caused Mr B a personal injustice.
-
Cheshire West & Chester Council (25 026 701)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 24-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate how the Council handled Mrs X’s alleged whistleblowing complaint or its decision to manage her contact with the Council. There is not enough evidence of fault or significant injustice to warrant an investigation. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about her subject access request and other data handling matters as the Information Commissioner is better place to handle this.
-
Surrey Heath Borough Council (25 025 736)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 24-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council conducted a Community Governance Review. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.
-
Cumberland Council (26 014 226)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 24-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about an email sent by the Council that refers to him. This is because there is no evidence of a significant injustice.
-
London Borough of Haringey (25 030 917)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 24-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his personal data or its enforcement of Penalty Charge Notices (PCNs). Complaints about data handling are better considered by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). Mr X had a right of appeal for the PCNs, and it would have been reasonable for him to use that.
-
Salford City Council (26 008 172)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 24-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council misusing Ms X’s data. The Information Commissioner’s Office is best placed to consider the issue.
-
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 24-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Ms X's complaint about the Council's handling of her Subject Access Request (SAR). The Information Commissioner is better placed to consider complaints about access to information and compliance with data protection legislation.
-
Westminster City Council (26 003 789)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 23-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Mr X’s personal information being shared by a council officer. This is because the Information Commissioner’s Office is the appropriate body to consider complaints about data protection, and the law prevents us investigating personnel matters.