Recent statements in this category are shown below:
-
Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council (26 012 176)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 11-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council delayed making a compensation payment to X. This is because the issue has not caused X a significant enough injustice to warrant our involvement.
-
City of Doncaster Council (25 030 201)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 11-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about his visit to the Council’s One Stop Shop. This is because a further investigation of the matter by this office is unlikely to be able to add to the response and explanation already provided via the Council’s own investigation.
-
Sheffield City Council (25 025 208)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 11-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about damage caused to Miss X’s home. This is because it is unlikely further investigation would lead to a different outcome.
-
Manchester City Council (26 011 344)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 09-Aug-2026
Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about defects to a residential property. This is because the Council was acting in its capacity as a landlord at the time, and the law does not allow us to investigate these types of complaints.
-
Manchester City Council (25 027 611)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 09-Aug-2026
Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions relating to a property. This is because the Council was acting as a landlord at the time, and the law does not allow us to investigate. Nor will we investigate a complaint about Mr X being billed for Council tax arrears. That complaint is late and there are no good reasons to consider it now.
-
Swindon Borough Council (26 011 685)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 29-Jul-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the circumstances leading to damage to Dr X’s property, and the Council’s handling of Dr X’s complaint about the matter. Dr X has an alternative legal remedy to pursue a claim of negligence through the court. Only the court can decide the Council was negligent, so it is reasonable for Dr X to pursue his alternative legal remedy.
-
Bristol City Council (26 010 886)
Statement Upheld Other 21-Jul-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to reduce the height of a fence. There is not enough evidence of fault in how the Council reached its decision to justify an investigation of the complaint. The Council provided a proportionate remedy for the distress caused to Ms X by failing to notify her of the decision to reduce the fence height.
-
Milton Keynes Council (25 025 822)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 16-Jul-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to properly maintain a private walkway at the back of her property. This is because the issue does not cause Mrs X significant injustice and any dispute over whether it has fulfilled its obligations regarding her rights of access are is more appropriate for consideration by the courts.
-
London Borough of Waltham Forest (25 022 759)
Statement Upheld Other 13-Jul-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about money owed to Miss X under the Council’s self-help scheme. The Council has offered a suitable remedy through its complaint procedure.
-
London Borough of Bromley (26 009 141)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 08-Jul-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a claim for damage to the complainant’s house. This is because the complainant has an alternative legal remedy, to pursue a claim of negligence through the courts. Only the courts can decide whether the Council was negligent. It is therefore reasonable to expect them to use their legal remedy.