Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 51110 results

  • Leeds City Council (24 000 087)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 18-Sep-2024

    Summary: Mrs X complained about the significant delays in the education, health and care plan process. We find the Council was at fault. This had a significant impact on Mrs X and her daughter. To remedy this injustice caused by fault the Council has agreed to apologise and make symbolic payments.

  • Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council (24 000 751)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 18-Sep-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions following the death of a citizen. The Council was required to arrange a funeral, which it did. The Council acted to seek the next of kin. While we appreciate the distress for the next of kin, there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to justify an investigation. It is unlikely we could add to the Council’s investigation or achieve a different outcome.

  • London Borough of Redbridge (24 002 309)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 18-Sep-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s considerations relating to a request for a reasonable adjustment. There is no evidence of fault.

  • Buckinghamshire Council (24 003 590)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Assessment and care plan 18-Sep-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to stop the direct payment which enabled a family member to provide care for his three adult children. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

  • London Borough of Wandsworth (24 004 246)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 18-Sep-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the special educational needs and school transport provision made by the Council for Mr X’s child. There is no evidence of fault by the Council in the matter of transport, Mr X has had a right of appeal to the SEND Tribunal regarding the provision at school he requires for his child, and there is not enough potential injustice created by others matters on their own to warrant our further involvement.

  • Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council (24 005 118)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 18-Sep-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council has failed to make a place available for the complainant’s son at an appropriate school. This is because investigation would not achieve the outcome the complainant is seeking.

  • Bristol City Council (24 005 289)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Charging 18-Sep-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s application to the Court of Protection and appointment as deputy for his relative. This is because we cannot investigate complaints about court action.

  • Norfolk County Council (24 005 448)

    Statement Upheld Fostering 18-Sep-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about children services’ actions. We have upheld Ms X’s complaint as the Council has now agreed to follow the Children Act statutory complaints’ procedure.

  • Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council (24 005 579)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 18-Sep-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s involvement with Ms X’s child, who is a looked after child. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant further investigation and we cannot achieve the outcomes Ms X wants.

  • Cornwall Council (24 005 698)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 18-Sep-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to validate Mr X’s planning application without additional information. Mr X can serve notice on the Council. If it refuses to validate the application, it is reasonable to expect Mr X to appeal to the Planning Inspectorate.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings