Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 55054 results

  • Bristol City Council (25 004 959)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway repair and maintenance 13-Oct-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council failing to resolve highway disrepair issues, failing to reply to an email, and failing to respond to the complainant’s Stage 2 complaint. It is reasonable to expect the complainant to use the alternative court remedy which is available, and he has not been caused a significant injustice by the Council’s failure to respond to an email.

  • London Borough of Bromley (25 013 450)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 12-Oct-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Council tax premium because there is a right of appeal to a Valuation Tribunal.

  • Brighton & Hove City Council (25 013 598)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 12-Oct-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Council tax refund because there is insufficient injustice to warrant investigation.

  • London Borough of Haringey (25 013 626)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 12-Oct-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council tax discounts because there is a right of appeal to a Valuation Tribunal.

  • London Borough of Croydon (24 007 257)

    Statement Upheld Homelessness 12-Oct-2025

    Summary: Mrs X complained about the Council’s failure to provide her with suitable accommodation. We found fault with the Council for the delay in offering Mrs X and her family alternative accommodation. We also found fault in the way the Council communicated with Mrs X and dealt with her complaint. The Council’s fault caused injustice to Mrs X and her family. The Council has agreed to apologise and make symbolic payments. The Council has already taken action to ensure no families with children are housed in accommodation with shared facilities. The Council is also improving its complaint handling. The Council has agreed some further service improvements.

  • London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham (24 007 597)

    Statement Upheld Homelessness 12-Oct-2025

    Summary: We have found the Council at fault for failing to notify Miss X that it had accepted the main housing duty. This delayed Miss X’s review rights and caused her avoidable distress. The Council has agreed to apologise and pay Miss X a symbolic payment in recognition of the avoidable distress.

  • London Borough of Enfield (24 013 085)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 12-Oct-2025

    Summary: Mrs D complains the Council failed to require assessments as part of the planning application process. I have not found fault by the Council; it acted in line with its policies and procedures.

  • Brighton & Hove City Council (24 013 238)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 12-Oct-2025

    Summary: Dr Y complained about the Council’s handling of S’s Education, Health and Care needs assessment between January 2023 and October 2023. The Council is at fault for delays in adequately assessing its section 19 duties and failing to ensure S received all the provision set out in his plan from October 2023. This caused Dr Y avoidable uncertainty and frustration as well as loss of provision for S. The Council has agreed to apologise to Dr Y, make a payment to recognise the injustice and act to prevent recurrence.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 014 635)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 12-Oct-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of the statutory complaint procedure concerning the safeguarding of Mr X’s child. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

  • London Borough of Waltham Forest (24 016 101)

    Statement Upheld Homelessness 12-Oct-2025

    Summary: Miss X complained about how the Council responded to her homelessness. She said the Council failed to address the risk to her and her children and placed her in unsuitable accommodation. Miss X also complained the Council placed her in the wrong housing band. The Council was at fault for failing to deal properly with Miss X’s homelessness. It should apologise to Miss X, make a symbolic payment to her, and provide information to its staff.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings