Noise


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (25 013 023)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 13-Jan-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about noise nuisance because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

  • East Lindsey District Council (25 014 261)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 12-Jan-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a noise nuisance investigation because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

  • Southampton City Council (25 003 717)

    Statement Not upheld Noise 12-Jan-2026

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council’s response to his reports of excessive noise and a planning breach relating to premises close to his home. We have not found fault by the Council.

  • London Borough of Bromley (25 011 759)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 08-Jan-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to uphold a lease agreement with a local airport. We have not seen enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

  • Blaby District Council (25 010 404)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 05-Jan-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council handled a report of noise nuisance. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault in the way the Council made its decision not to take further action.

  • Westminster City Council (25 018 851)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 22-Dec-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about noise and odour from a bakery. This is because we could not add to the response the Council has already provided.

  • Westminster City Council (25 017 471)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 18-Dec-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to take enforcement action regarding Mr X’s reports of anti-social behaviour and its failure to make reasonable adjustments for Mr X’s disability. This is because the complaint is late and there is no good reason to exercise discretion. In addition, the Council has investigated and put forward appropriate remedies; an investigation into this matter would not lead to a different outcome for Mr X.

  • Stoke-on-Trent City Council (25 009 864)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 15-Dec-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of a noise complaint and its report to a review panel. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

  • East Hampshire District Council (25 008 648)

    Statement Upheld Noise 11-Dec-2025

    Summary: We have upheld Mr X and Mr Y’s complaint about delay in investigating noise disturbance. The Council have agreed a suitable remedy.

  • Reading Borough Council (25 006 455)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 26-Nov-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council refuses to consider Mr X’s ongoing complaints about noise nuisance from his neighbour. This is because we are unlikely to find enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant an investigation.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings