Recent statements in this category are shown below:
-
Milton Keynes Council (25 005 573)
Statement Not upheld Antisocial behaviour 03-Feb-2026
Summary: There is no evidence of fault in the Council’s decision not to enforce an abatement notice, which it issued after establishing a statutory noise nuisance. And we cannot investigate a complaint about the Council’s decision not to evict its tenant for causing the nuisance, because the law does not allow us to. We have therefore discontinued our investigation.
-
Mansfield District Council (25 013 384)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 03-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to reports of antisocial behaviour. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.
-
London Borough of Hackney (25 013 070)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 03-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to install CCTV at Mr X’s request. This is because an investigation would be unlikely to find fault with the Council’s actions.
-
London Borough of Southwark (25 024 549)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 30-Jan-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of a noise nuisance complaint. This is because the Council has investigated Mr X’s complaint and taken steps to respond. Therefore, it is unlikely further investigation by us would lead to a significantly different outcome.
-
Test Valley Borough Council (25 012 067)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 29-Jan-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Council officer’s conduct during a meeting that Mr X was involved in. There is no worthwhile outcome achievable by investigating this matter.
-
Dartford Borough Council (25 012 985)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 29-Jan-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council issuing him a Community Protection Warning because there is not enough evidence of fault. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about how the Council responded to his request for access to his information as these matters are best considered by the Information Commissioner’s Office.
-
Dacorum Borough Council (25 012 172)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 26-Jan-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to reports of anti-social behaviour. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.
-
Nottingham City Council (25 001 569)
Statement Upheld Antisocial behaviour 23-Jan-2026
Summary: Mr X complained the Council failed to take action to clear rubbish in his neighbour’s garden. We find the Council at fault for misleading Mr X by telling him to complete a pest control referral and for failing to acknowledge his complaint about service failure. The Council has agreed to apologise to Mr X, make a symbolic payment and complete service improvements to remedy the injustice caused.
-
Birmingham City Council (25 016 216)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 22-Jan-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to act on Mrs X’s concerns about her neighbour and the condition of their garden. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council. We also cannot look at the Council’s actions when it is acting as a social housing provider.
-
London Borough of Southwark (25 011 316)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 19-Jan-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s response to anti-social behaviour. There is insufficient evidence of fault to justify investigating.