Recent statements in this category are shown below:
-
Lancaster City Council (25 011 023)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 13-Jan-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to a report of fly-tipping. The injustice is not significant enough to warrant our involvement.
-
Birmingham City Council (25 011 705)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 13-Jan-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about how the Council has responded to her concerns about large trees in a neighbouring garden, and how it has dealt with her complaint. Ms X’s complaint about the Council up to 2023 is late and there are no good reasons for us to investigate it now. Her complaint about more recent events is premature for us to investigate. We also cannot achieve the outcome Ms X seeks.
-
London Borough of Southwark (25 007 931)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 08-Jan-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to Mr X’s anti-social behaviour complaint. This is because an investigation would be unlikely to find fault with the Council’s actions.
-
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 08-Jan-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to issue a Community Protection Warning. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.
-
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 07-Jan-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to issue Mrs X with a community protection warning letter. There is no evidence to suggest Mrs X has suffered a significant injustice which would warrant our involvement. In any case, there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by us investigating.
-
Luton Borough Council (25 015 833)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 07-Jan-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint from Mr X about how the Council has managed matters concerning a statutory nuisance caused by a neighbouring company. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.
-
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council (25 010 140)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 05-Jan-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to Anti-social behaviour. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions and we cannot achieve what Miss X is looking for.
-
London Borough of Islington (25 008 979)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 18-Dec-2025
Summary: We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint the Council failed to repair structural damage to her property; or that it mismanaged her son’s benefits. Both these complaints are outside our jurisdiction. We will not investigate her complaint about her neighbour’s use of CCTV, that is because the Information Commissioner’s Office is best placed to consider the matter.
-
Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (25 008 323)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 17-Dec-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to Mr X’s reports of noise nuisance. This is because the Council responded to these reports in line with its policy and it is unlikely we would find fault in its response.
-
London Borough of Enfield (24 012 457)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 15-Dec-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council failed to take enforcement action against his neighbour for fly tipping. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.