Recent statements in this category are shown below:
-
Dacorum Borough Council (25 011 979)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 03-Mar-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about communication with the Council. This is because any injustice is not significant enough to warrant an investigation by the Ombudsman.
-
Three Rivers District Council (25 014 056)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 02-Mar-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with reports about anti-social behaviour. This is because the complaint is about the management of social housing, and therefore it is outside our jurisdiction.
-
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 02-Mar-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about antisocial behaviour. There is insufficient evidence of fault to justify an investigation.
-
Test Valley Borough Council (25 016 033)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 27-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of reports of abandoned vehicles. This is because the claimed injustice is not significant enough to warrant our involvement.
-
Hart District Council (25 013 670)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 25-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Miss Y’s complaint about the Council’s decision to issue her with a community protection warning, and that a Council officer breached her right to confidentiality. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision to justify our involvement, and the Information Commissioner is better placed to consider and decide complaints about data protection.
-
Wychavon District Council (25 005 702)
Statement Upheld Antisocial behaviour 24-Feb-2026
Summary: Mr and Mrs X complain the Council did not deal properly with anti-social behaviour (ASB), causing avoidable distress and economic loss. The Council did not deal properly with reported ASB. Mr and Mrs X suffered avoidable distress. The Council should make a symbolic payment to Mr and Mrs X.
-
London Borough of Hounslow (25 013 757)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 23-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to provide reports on noise nuisance and fire safety to support her legal claim against her social housing landlord. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.
-
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 20-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to take sufficient action over noise nuisance and anti- social behaviour in Mr X’s neighbourhood. This complaint was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Mr X could not have complained to us sooner.
-
Birmingham City Council (25 012 057)
Statement Upheld Antisocial behaviour 19-Feb-2026
Summary: We have upheld Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s response to reports of anti-social behaviour. The Council have agreed to a suitable remedy.
-
London Borough of Hillingdon (25 012 883)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 17-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision relating to Miss X’s report of a high hedge. The Council investigated the report and decided it could not take any action. It is unlikely we would find any fault in its decision.