Special educational needs


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Manchester City Council (24 018 348)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 12-May-2026

    Summary: The Council failed to issue D’s Education, Health and Care Plan within statutory timescales and delayed putting alternative provision in place after D stopped attending school. To remedy the injustice caused by this fault, the Council has agreed to carry out the actions set out at the end of this statement.

  • Bath and North East Somerset Council (25 006 049)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 12-May-2026

    Summary: We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint about the process the Council followed in deciding her son’s special educational needs support. She had a right of appeal to the SEND Tribunal about these matters, and our role cannot overlap that of the Tribunal. However, the Council was at fault for a delay in deciding Miss X’s son’s support. It has agreed to apologise, and it will take steps to improve its service.

  • Buckinghamshire Council (25 010 765)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 12-May-2026

    Summary: Mr X complained the Council failed to complete an Education, Health and Care needs assessment within statutory timeframes. We find the Council at fault for a delay in completing the Education, Health and Care needs assessment. The delay is fault which caused Mr X and his family distress, frustration and uncertainty and frustrated their right to appeal. The Council has agreed to apologise and make a symbolic payment to remedy the injustice caused.

  • Buckinghamshire Council (25 013 702)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 12-May-2026

    Summary: The Council was at fault for almost nine months delay assessing Mrs X’s child, W, for an Education, Health and Care Plan. This caused Mrs X significant frustration and uncertainty and meant W missed out on some special educational provision they should have had. To remedy their injustice, the Council will apologise to Mrs X and make symbolic payments. The Council is already taking suitable action to prevent similar fault in future.

  • Durham County Council (25 019 607)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 12-May-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about how the Council has dealt with matters concerning her child’s education. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

  • Suffolk County Council (25 020 407)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 12-May-2026

    Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about educational provision and placements because it was reasonable for Miss X to use her right to appeal to the Tribunal. The law does not allow us to investigate this complaint.

  • Southend-on-Sea City Council (25 023 120)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 12-May-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s refusal to issue an Education, Health and Care Plan. This is because Miss X used her right to appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability).

  • Bristol City Council (25 011 279)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 11-May-2026

    Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions in deciding provision for Ms X’s child’s special educational needs. Ms X used her right of appeal to a tribunal about the provision specified by the Council, and the matters complained of are closely related to that.

  • Cheshire West & Chester Council (25 017 893)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 11-May-2026

    Summary: We upheld Mrs X’s complaint about delays in the Education, Health and Care (EHC) process for her child and the Council’s poor communication because the Council upheld the complaints, apologised, and offered a £200 symbolic payment. We cannot investigate how the Council conducted school consultations, its decision to name a specific school in an EHC Plan, or delivery of the EHC Plan because Mrs X appealed to a tribunal and the law says we cannot investigate. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about alternative education because the claimed injustice is not significant enough.

  • Kent County Council (25 020 422)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 11-May-2026

    Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint that the Council was at fault in the handling of her son’s transfer to secondary education and in the course of her appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability).

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings