Recent statements in this category are shown below:
-
Peterborough City Council (25 020 297)
Statement Upheld School transport 18-May-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s home-to-school transport arrangements for her child. This is because, at our invitation, the Council agreed to conduct a new Independent Review appeal to consider the transport arrangements. We consider this a suitable remedy.
-
Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 18-May-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Mr F’s complaint about school transport because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.
-
Leeds City Council (25 018 700)
Statement Upheld School transport 17-May-2026
Summary: There was fault in the way the Council considered Mr X’s application for post-16 transport and in how it applied its own policy to consider whether the expectation placed on parents to facilitate transport was ‘reasonably practical’. The Council has agreed to apologise, make a symbolic payment to recognise Mr X’s time and trouble, to take the decision again, and make service improvements. The complaint is upheld.
-
Kent County Council (25 011 718)
Statement Not upheld School transport 14-May-2026
Summary: Mrs X complained about the Council’s failure to provide suitable school transport for her child’s disabilities and special needs. This caused significant distress, frustration and inconvenience for the family. We have ended our investigation as Mrs X has reached a settlement with the Council and achieved most of the outcomes she wanted. We could not achieve significantly more, and it would not be a proportionate use of our resources to further investigate.
-
Leeds City Council (25 021 128)
Statement Upheld School transport 14-May-2026
Summary: We have found fault in the way the Council considered Ms X’s application for post-16 transport and in how it applied its own policy. The Council has agreed to apologise, make a symbolic payment to recognise time and trouble, to retake the decision, and to make service improvements. The complaint is upheld.
-
North Yorkshire Council (25 012 926)
Statement Upheld School transport 13-May-2026
Summary: There was some fault in the way the Council publicised its new home to school transport policy. However, this did not cause Mr X a significant injustice as on balance this would not have affected Mr X’s decision regarding the school applied for their child to attend. There was no evidence of fault in the way the appeals committee considered Mr X’s appeal against the Council’s decision not to provide free transport.
-
North Somerset Council (25 023 311)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 13-May-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s failure to arrange home to school transport, or failure to ensure its transport operator met his reasonable adjustments. There is no evidence of a significant injustice which would warrant our involvement and further investigation by us would not achieve any other worthwhile outcome.
-
Central Bedfordshire Council (25 019 063)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 11-May-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about school transport. This is because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.
-
Wiltshire Council (25 019 952)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 11-May-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about special educational needs transport. We are unlikely to find fault with the Council.
-
Slough Borough Council (25 020 096)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 10-May-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his child’s post-16 transport. The Council has agreed the transport will continue unchanged and that is the outcome Mr X wanted. The injustice from the remaining issues does not warrant our involvement.