School transport


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Wakefield City Council (25 005 932)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 08-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision not to provide free home to school transport for his son. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council to warrant an investigation.

  • North Yorkshire Council (25 006 114)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 08-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about fault in the Council’s implementation of its home to school transport policy. This is because the matter complained about has not caused Ms X any significant personal injustice which is serious enough to warrant an investigation.

  • Nottinghamshire County Council (25 012 102)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 07-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse a home to school transport application. It is unlikely we would find fault.

  • Derbyshire County Council (24 017 854)

    Statement Upheld School transport 04-Sep-2025

    Summary: Mrs X complained the Council wrongly refused to award transport for her son Mr Y who is over 19 and has an Education Health and Care Plan. She also said the Council had failed to carry out transport appeal properly, communicate with her and respond to her complaint. We found fault in the way the Council made its decision about transport for Mr Y and in the way it handled Mrs X’s appeal. This fault caused injustice to Mrs X as she was distressed and could not be satisfied her appeal was properly considered. The Council has agreed to apologise, re-take a decision on Mrs X’s new transport application and make a distress payment.

  • Leicestershire County Council (24 017 090)

    Statement Upheld School transport 03-Sep-2025

    Summary: Mrs X complained the Council failed to properly assess her child’s transport needs, did not communicate effectively and caused delays in arranging suitable transport. We find the Council at fault for failing to reflect key information from the application in its risk assessment, and for failing to keep Mrs X updated. As a result, unsuitable transport was arranged, and Mrs X incurred avoidable costs to ensure her child could attend education. The Council has agreed to apologise and make a payment to Mrs X.

  • Leicester City Council (25 002 871)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 03-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council not providing a bus pass for her child. This is because the Council has agreed to consider an application from Miss X and it is unlikely investigation would achieve significantly more for her.

  • Durham County Council (25 002 413)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 02-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X complaint about shared home to school transport. It is unlikely we would find fault in the Council’s decision not to agree to solo transport with a medical professional accompanying her child.

  • Halton Borough Council (25 002 506)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 02-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision not to provide Miss X’s child with free transport to school. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (25 003 463)

    Statement Upheld School transport 02-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the school transport provision for Miss X’s child. It is unlikely that an investigation by us would add to the Council’s own investigation or lead to the outcome Miss X is seeking.

  • Surrey County Council (25 004 071)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 20-Aug-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to provide bespoke post-16 transport to school for the complainant’s child. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings