St. Michaels Church Of England Primary School (26 009 486)

Category : Education > School admissions

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 01 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the outcome of a school admission appeal panel. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained the school admission appeal panel (the “panel”) failed to properly consider her appeal regarding her child, Y.
  2. Miss X said this has meant that Y has no school place and has caused emotional distress and uncertainty. She wanted the panel’s decision to be reviewed and for Y to be provided with a place at the school.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the school.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Ombudsman is not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong, regardless of whether a person disagrees with the decision an organisation made.
  2. The admission appeal decision letter explained the panel considered the information and comments provided by Miss X in her statement and during the appeal. The panel minutes include Miss X’s points.
  3. After consideration, the panel decided the arguments made by Miss X did not outweigh the prejudice that would arise by admitting Y to the school. As the Council properly considered Miss X’s points, we will not investigate this complaint as there is not enough evidence of fault.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings