What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

London Borough of Newham (25 031 989)

Category : Education > School admissions

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Jun 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the information provided and process to apply for an out of cohort school admission. There is insignificant injustice to Mrs X and we are unlikely to achieve more than the service improvement proposed.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X says the Council failed to provide the correct advice and delayed in offering a school place.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X which included the Council’s reply to her complaint.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X’s child Y attended primary school in the year below their cohort. Mrs X says she did not realise, and no one had told her, that she needed to apply for a secondary school place whilst Y was in year five rather than wait until they were in year six. She complained to the Council in September 2025.
  2. By March 2026, the Council had accepted Mrs X had not been properly informed and there needed to be improvements in the communication about how to handle applications like hers. Y had been offered a place at their preferred school to start in year seven in September 2026 and to remain a year below their cohort. Y has missed no education.
  3. Mrs X says she incurred time and trouble in pursing her complaint and getting the situation sorted. She says she needs a full apology.
  4. Having to complain is not significant enough injustice to warrant our investigation. The Council in its final reply to Mrs X said: “be assured your family’s casework has delivered lesson learnt on how we can work with schools to improve the process for others and we will be publishing this on the Newham website.” Our investigation is unlikely to achieve more than this service improvement.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is insufficient injustice to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings