Jewish Community Secondary School (25 023 242)
Category : Education > School admissions
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 25 Mar 2026
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an unsuccessful school admission appeal. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault.
The complaint
- Ms X complains about an unsuccessful school admission appeal for her child, Y. She says she is dissatisfied with the outcome and believes the School has not taken Y’s needs into consideration. Ms X says this has caused Y to suffer.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))
- We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by the complainant and the school.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- Ms X applied to transfer Y to the School. There were no places available in the relevant year group, so the School declined her application.
- Ms X says the School didn’t consider the information provided to support a school move for Y. She appealed the decision.
- The appeal panel notes show that the panel considered the information provided by both Y’s parents and the school. The panel decided the prejudice to the school and its pupils by admitting another child was significant enough to decline the appeal. That was a matter for the professional judgement of the panel members.
- Although Ms X disagrees with the outcome, this is not evidence of fault. We do not act as an appeal body and can only consider if there was evidence of fault in the way in which the school made the decision. There is no such evidence. That being the case, it is not for the Ombudsman to criticise the decision the appeal panel made, or intervene to substitute an alternative view.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman