Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Warwickshire County Council (20 013 061)

Category : Education > School admissions

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 14 Jul 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr C complained about a school admissions appeal hearing for his son. We have stopped investigating the complaint because Mr C’s son has now been offered a place at his preferred school and we could not achieve a better outcome than this for the complainant.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall refer to as Mr C, complains about a school admissions appeal hearing for his son. In particular, Mr C says the appeal panel based its decision to refuse his son a school place on incorrect information about the walking route to the school where his son had been offered a place.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We cannot question whether an independent school admissions appeals panel’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider if there was fault in the way the decision was reached. If we find fault, which calls into question the panel’s decision, we may ask for a new appeal hearing. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • it is unlikely we would find fault, or
  • the fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • the injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • it is unlikely we could add to any previous investigation by the Council, or
  • it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or
  • there is another body better placed to consider this complaint, or
  • it would be reasonable for the person to ask for a council review or appeal.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I read the papers provided by Mr C, discussed the complaint with him and considered some information from the Council. I have explained my draft decision to Mr C and the Council and provided an opportunity for comment.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr C moved into the Council’s area and applied for his son to attend a local school. Because there were no places available at Mr C’s preferred schools the Council offered a place at a different school. Mr C appealed this decision but was unsuccessful.
  2. Mr C complained to the Ombudsman about the appeal process. Mr C considered the appeal panel based its decision to refuse his son a school place on incorrect information about the walking route to the school where his son had been offered a place.
  3. During my investigation, Mr C explained that he had now been offered a place at his preferred school for his son.
  4. Where we find fault in the conduct of an appeal which calls a panel’s decision into question, we usually ask the authority concerned to arrange a new appeal as a remedy for the resulting injustice.
  5. I have not reached a view about whether the appeal panel in Mr C’s case was at fault. But even if I were to find fault which had affected the outcome of Mr C’s appeal, I would not be able to recommend a better remedy than the offer of a school place. I have ended my investigation for this reason.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I have ended my involvement as further investigation would not achieve a better outcome for the complainant.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page