Wokingham Borough Council (20 007 688)

Category : Education > School admissions

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 26 May 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: A parent complained about the way the school admission appeal panel dealt with her case when it decided to reject her appeal regarding the refusal of a place for her son at her preferred primary school. But we cannot investigate this matter because the school in question is an academy school and we have no jurisdiction to consider complaints about appeals for academies.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. In particular, we investigate complaints about councils and certain other bodies. But we cannot investigate the actions of school academies, or school admission appeal panels which consider appeals for academies. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 25 and 34A, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information Miss B provided with her complaint and her comments when we spoke on the telephone.

Back to top

What I found

  1. C was due to start school in September 2020. When Miss B applied for a school place for C she listed the School as her first preference. However the School refused Miss B’s application because all the places there went to children who had a higher priority for admission than C under its Admissions Policy.
  2. Miss B appealed about the refusal of a place, and the School asked the Council to set up an independent appeal panel on its behalf. However the panel turned down Miss B’s appeal. She then complained to us about the way the panel had decided her case.

Back to top

Analysis

  1. But we cannot investigate Miss B’s complaint about the appeal panel.
  2. The Council organised the appeal in Miss B’s case. But in doing so it was acting on behalf of the School. The School is its own admission authority and therefore is ultimately responsible for decisions about admissions and for appeal arrangements. So Miss B’s complaint is against the School rather than the Council.
  3. But the School is also an academy. This means the School is not maintained by the Council and it is funded directly by central government. We have no jurisdiction to consider complaints about academies or admission appeals for academies. Complaints about academy appeals are dealt with by the Education and Skills Funding Agency.

 

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Miss B’s complaint about the way the school admission appeal panel reached its decision to turn down her appeal regarding a place for her son at her preferred school. This is because the school in question is an academy and the law prevents us from considering complaints about appeals for school academies.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings