Hampshire County Council (19 006 590)

Category : Education > School admissions

Decision : Not upheld

Decision date : 23 Dec 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mrs M’s complains following her unsuccessful appeal for a place for her son, B, at a junior school. B was later offered a place at the school, so I have ended my investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs M complains about her unsuccessful appeal for a place for her son, B, at a junior school. In particular, Mrs M complains:
    • members of the appeal panel were abrupt and unsympathetic; and
    • she felt uncomfortable addressing the panel in the presence of the school’s head teacher.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. The Ombudsman cannot question a school admission appeal panel’s decision simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider if there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3))
  2. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • the fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered:
    • Mrs M’s comments;
    • all the information presented to the Appeal Panel, the notes taken by the Clerk during the appeal, and the Panel’s decision letter following the appeal; and
    • the School Admissions Appeals Code 2012.
  2. I invited Mrs M and the Council to comment on my draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. The Ombudsman checks the appeal was carried out properly. We do not decide whether Mrs M’s son should be given a place at the school. If we find fault in the appeal, we might recommend a fresh appeal. We cannot admit a child to the school.
  2. Since making her complaint to the Ombudsman, Mrs M’s son was offered a place at the school. This is a better outcome than I could achieve and there is nothing to be gained by investigating the complaint further.
  3. Following a meeting with the school’s head teacher, however, Mrs M turned down the offer of a place at the school. Mrs M is unhappy with the way the offer was handled and wishes to complain. This is a new complaint. The admission authority, the Council, must have an opportunity to respond before the Ombudsman can consider the complaint. Mrs M may wish to take the matter up with the Council.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. As B was offered a place at the school, there is nothing more I could achieve for Mrs M by investigating her complaint about the appeal so I have ended my investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings