Alternative provision


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Surrey County Council (19 005 711)

    Statement Upheld Alternative provision 07-Feb-2020

    Summary: The Council was at fault for failing to provide Y a suitable education when his anxiety meant he could not go to school. The Council has agreed to pay Miss X a financial remedy for the education that Y has missed. It will also remind staff of the responsibility to assess the academic needs of children unable to access education and where necessary provide alternative education.

  • Bath and North East Somerset Council (18 018 009)

    Statement Upheld Alternative provision 05-Feb-2020

    Summary: There was fault by the Council in failing to provide education to a child who, due to anxiety and depression, could only attend school intermittently. There was also fault in the Council's commissioning arrangements for alternative education and its advice to schools. This caused the complainants distress, loss of education and unnecessary legal fees. The complaint is upheld

  • Norfolk County Council (19 008 262)

    Statement Upheld Alternative provision 31-Jan-2020

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council's provision of alternative education when his daughter was absent from school for medical reasons. The Council was at fault for delays in arranging alternative provision. However, the education provided by the Council was suitable. The content of the work provided by the school is outside of the Ombudsman's jurisdiction.

  • Derbyshire County Council (19 001 142)

    Statement Upheld Alternative provision 17-Jan-2020

    Summary: Ms X complained the Council failed to ensure her daughter, D, received a suitable education from February to July 2019 when she was not in school and failed to carry out her annual review according to the statutory timescales. The Council was at fault for not ensuring a suitable education for D from June to July 2019. It should make a financial payment to remedy the injustice this caused D. I have not investigated Ms X's complaint that the Council failed to carry out D's annual review within the statutory timescales.

  • Surrey County Council (19 004 969)

    Statement Upheld Alternative provision 11-Dec-2019

    Summary: Mrs X complains the Council failed to provide suitable educational provision for her daughter and delayed in dealing with her complaint. Mrs X says this caused daughter to fall behind with her education and her behaviour to deteriorate. From the evidence provided, the Ombudsman finds fault with the Council as it failed to provide adequate educational provision for Mrs X's daughter. The Council has agreed to the Ombudsman's recommendations to remedy the injustice caused.

  • Birmingham City Council (18 018 161)

    Statement Upheld Alternative provision 04-Dec-2019

    Summary: Miss Y complained the Council failed to provide suitable full-time education to her child, D, who cannot attend school because of anxiety. The Council was at fault. It delayed ensuring D received a suitable education and so D has missed out on a year of school. The Council has agreed to make a payment to acknowledge the loss of education and ensure a suitable plan is in place for D's education. It has also agreed to review its policies to ensure appropriate education is in place for those who are out of school for reasons other than illness.

  • Hampshire County Council (18 018 176)

    Statement Upheld Alternative provision 03-Dec-2019

    Summary: Mr X complains that the Council failed to provide his son with education for four months and there were delays handling his complaint. He says this meant his son missed out on education and exacerbated his illness. He says he had to provide his son with education. He says this caused worry, stress and inconvenience. The Ombudsman does not find fault with the Council about the child missing education. However, the Ombudsman finds fault with the Council for delays in handling Mr X's complaint. This caused Mr X injustice. We are satisfied with the action the Council has already taken to remedy this injustice.

  • Suffolk County Council (18 019 738)

    Statement Upheld Alternative provision 25-Nov-2019

    Summary: fault by the Council meant B did not receive education for six weeks following his permanent exclusion from school.

  • Essex County Council (19 004 831)

    Statement Upheld Alternative provision 21-Nov-2019

    Summary: Miss X complains the Council failed to provide suitable education to her son Y following his exclusion. The Ombudsman finds the Council at fault and recommends it provides an apology and makes a payment for loss of education.

  • Surrey County Council (18 014 395)

    Statement Not upheld Alternative provision 20-Nov-2019

    Summary: there is no fault by the Council in relation to the action it took to provide Y with education between May 2017 and January 2019. The Ombudsman cannot look at education provision from January 2019 because Ms G exercised her right to appeal to the SEN Tribunal at that time.