Child protection


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Staffordshire County Council (25 015 824)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 03-Feb-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the conduct of three social workers allocated to her family’s case between 2021 and 2024. This is because the complaint is late and there are no good grounds to exercise discretion to consider it now.

  • Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council (25 014 131)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 02-Feb-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the contents of the Council’s court ordered report and it not acting in line with a court order. This is because there is no sign of fault in the Council’s decision not to consider her complaint until the ongoing court proceedings have concluded.

  • Reading Borough Council (25 017 479)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 02-Feb-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Council social worker failing to include Mr X in plans for a child protection visit. This is because there is insufficient injustice to warrant an investigation.

  • Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (25 011 880)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 29-Jan-2026

    Summary: We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint about contact with her children or the Council’s assessment of this because this is before a Court. We are unlikely to find fault in the Council’s decision to have a Child Protection Plan. And we are unlikely to significantly add to the Council’s replies to Miss X’s complaint about communication issues.

  • Lancashire County Council (25 010 658)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 28-Jan-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint on behalf of Miss Y about how the Council considered safeguarding concerns. This is because the substantive issues are outside of our jurisdiction.

  • London Borough of Southwark (25 011 616)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 28-Jan-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of contact arrangements with his child. Part of his complaint is late and there are no good reasons why it could not have been raised with us sooner. Of the part that is not late, the Council has investigated his concerns and further investigation by us would not lead to a different outcome for Mr X. Nor will we investigate the procedure the Council used to investigate Mr X’s complaint. It is unlikely we would find fault.

  • London Borough of Croydon (25 011 907)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 28-Jan-2026

    Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s actions following it starting a Child Protection Plan. It is not in our jurisdiction because Mr X pursued an alternative legal remedy and it would be reasonable to expect him to raise his complaints as part of ongoing court proceedings.

  • Derby City Council (25 012 095)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 28-Jan-2026

    Summary: We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint about court and legal costs. There are no sufficient reasons to investigate her complaint about events known to her for more than 12 months. And there is no worthwhile outcome achievable in investigating her complaint about failures to provide financial support for caring for a child in the last 12 months.

  • Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council (25 012 277)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 28-Jan-2026

    Summary: We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint about child protection. The issues raised are subject to court action. We have no power to investigate a complaint where the issues raised are subject to court proceedings.

  • Telford & Wrekin Council (25 012 285)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 28-Jan-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about his anonymous referral to Children’s Services because there is nothing we could add to the Council’s investigation, and there is no worthwhile outcome achievable.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings