Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Central Bedfordshire Council (20 011 925)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 19-Apr-2022

    Summary: Mrs B complained about how the Council dealt with the assessment and support of her daughter. The Council has completed the statutory children's complaints process, which means the issues have been independently investigated, and a Panel has reviewed the investigation. The Council has acknowledged there was fault and agreed a means to remedy this. There is no fault in the investigation and no basis for me to recommend that the Council take further action.

  • London Borough of Wandsworth (20 007 935)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 19-Apr-2022

    Summary: The Ombudsman found fault on Ms D's complaint against the Council. It failed to bring her case back to the adoption panel promptly and did not pursue one of its recommendations. It failed to provide her with a copy of her file as it said it would. She was given incorrect information about missing documents. It communicated poorly with her, failed to give her clear information about its role with the new regional adoption agency, failed to give her support, and delayed dealing with her complaint and case. The agreed action remedies the injustice caused.

  • West Sussex County Council (21 017 603)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 04-Apr-2022

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X's complaint about the Council's actions in relation to his daughter whilst she was a looked-after child. That is because the Council has agreed to consider his complaints through the Children's Statutory Complaints procedure.

  • Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (20 014 157)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 02-Mar-2022

    Summary: We do not find fault in the investigation of Miss Y's complaint about an adoption agency's involvement with her grandchildren who are subject to a Special Guardianship Order. We do not uphold the points of complaint which Miss Y continues to dispute because they have been subject to a thorough and independent investigation. However, we consider the remedy already provided does not go far enough in resolving Miss Y's injustice. The Council will make a payment of £250 to fully remedy the time and trouble from the fault identified during the complaint investigation. The Council will also meet with Miss Y to consider whether her grandchildren need ongoing support.

  • Middlesbrough Borough Council (21 003 262)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 27-Jan-2022

    Summary: Mrs and Mrs X complained the Council unfairly reduced their adoption support payments after their eldest adopted child moved out and was accommodated by a neighbouring local authority. They also complained the Council has failed to provide them with respite care. There was no fault in how the Council decided to reduce their support payments. There was fault with its respite provision as it has not offered them respite in line with an agreed adoption support package. It will apologise, pay them £200 to acknowledge the frustration and uncertainty caused and confirm how it will provide this service going forward.

  • Cumbria County Council (21 009 640)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 02-Dec-2021

    Summary: The Council has unreasonably delayed considering Mr B's complaint at Stage 2 of the statutory procedure for children's services complaints. It has agreed to initiate Stage 2 and to offer to make a payment to Mr B to reflect the delay and the uncertainty this has caused.

  • Nottingham City Council (20 014 200)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 01-Nov-2021

    Summary: Mrs X complains that the Council refused to grant an adoption allowance for her adopted son, despite previously saying they would be entitled to it. She says this caused frustration, uncertainty, and stress. The Ombudsman finds the Council at fault for falsely raising Mrs X's hopes. This caused injustice. The Ombudsman is satisfied that the Council has already remedied the injustice caused.

  • London Borough of Merton (20 013 681)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 27-Oct-2021

    Summary: Mr and Mrs X complained the Council delayed in how it responded to their request for financial support as adoptive parents. We find the Council was at fault. That has caused Mr and Mrs X avoidable distress and frustration. The Council has offered a financial remedy and to review its guidance on adoption allowances. We are satisfied this remedies the injustice caused.

  • Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council (20 011 777)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 26-Sep-2021

    Summary: Mr and Mrs P complain about their dealings with the Council in the course of their adoption of their son, B. An independent investigation upheld 14 of their 15 complaints. The Council accepted the investigator's findings and recommendations. I agree with the independent investigator's findings and the action the Council has taken in response.

  • Royal Borough of Greenwich (21 007 563)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 12-Sep-2021

    Summary: The Council is at fault for delaying considering a complaint at stage three of the children's statutory complaints procedure. The Council has agreed to start its stage three investigation without delay and will offer to make a payment to the complainant to remedy the time and trouble its delay has caused him.