Adoption


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Liverpool City Council (18 006 427)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 02-Aug-2019

    Summary: Mr B and Mr C complain about a lack of support after the Council placed children with them for adoption. The Council was at fault, including for delaying arranging therapy for the children and for not sharing information properly. Those faults caused the family unnecessary practical difficulties, upset and uncertainty. The Council has agreed our recommendations, including an apology, payments to the family, providing any outstanding adoption support and changing procedures and staff training as necessary.

  • Suffolk County Council (18 011 493)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 16-Jul-2019

    Summary: Ms X complains that the Council has not provided a suitable remedy for the faults found in her children's social care complaint about lack of background information on her adopted child. The Ombudsman finds that the Council did not provide a sufficient remedy to recognise the impact of the long period without the information she needs. The Council has now agreed a suitable remedy including taking steps to obtain the information, reviewing procedures and making a payment to Ms X.

  • Wolverhampton City Council (18 009 478)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 04-Jul-2019

    Summary: The Council was at fault for a seven-month delay in arranging a meeting between Mr and Mrs B and their daughter's independent reviewing officer, and in providing them with photographs of their daughter from before it placed her for adoption. The Council has agreed to arrange the meeting, provide the photographs and apologise to Mr and Mrs B for the delay.

  • London Borough of Harrow (18 014 935)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 20-May-2019

    Summary: Mr and Mrs X complain on behalf of their daughter, Y and state the Council has failed to provide the post adoption support she needs. They say it delayed when dealing with their request for help and gave poor and conflicting advice about the type of support that is available. The Ombudsman has found the Council was at fault for the way it assessed Y's needs, the way it handled Mr and Mrs X's request for funding, and for failing to provide clear information and advice about the post adoption support process. It was also at fault for taking too long to initiate the EHC needs assessment process and for not following the children's statutory complaint procedure. These failures put Y at risk of harm and caused Mr and Mrs X distress, plus they incurred time and trouble when pursuing their complaint about this matter. To remedy this injustice, the Council has agreed to consider what support it will provide the family and make payments to them. It has also agreed to make several service improvements to prevent the faults identified from reoccurring.

  • Nottinghamshire County Council (18 012 802)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 29-Apr-2019

    Summary: Mr and Mrs B complain about the Council's actions when they approached it to adopt a child. Mr and Mrs B say this caused them significant distress and financial loss. The Council has accepted fault and offered a remedy. Mr and Mrs B are unhappy with the remedy. The Ombudsman finds fault with the Council. The Council agrees to reimburse Mr and Mrs B's costs, make a payment for avoidable distress and review its fostering and adoption policy.

  • Swindon Borough Council (18 009 464)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 29-Jan-2019

    Summary: Mr and Mrs X complained about the Council's delays in applying to the Adoption Support Fund and in dealing with their complaint about this matter. We have not investigated the part of their complaint about adoption support as they may pursue this further through the statutory children's social care complaints procedure. There was fault in the way the Council dealt with their complaint. The Council has agreed a suitable remedy including an apology, payment and a review of its complaint handling.

  • London Borough of Harrow (18 010 435)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 18-Dec-2018

    Summary: Mr and Mrs X says the Council failed to take meaningful action or provide support to their adopted daughter following incidents of self-harm. There was fault by the Council because it did not assess the support needs of Mr and Mrs X and their daughter. The Council agreed a financial remedy to reflect the injustice suffered by the family in consequence of this fault.

  • Derbyshire County Council (16 015 352)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 15-Nov-2018

    Summary: Mrs C says the Council failed to communicate and work with her while it arranged foster placements for her estranged son and that it failed to investigate her complaint about these matters properly. On the evidence so far seen, the Council was at fault for unacceptable delay in the complaints process but was not otherwise at fault. The Council should pay her £250 and apologise.

  • Hampshire County Council (18 007 583)

    Statement Not upheld Adoption 12-Nov-2018

    Summary: Ms X says the Council unreasonably refused to meet a duty to investigate and compile a report for a court under the Adoption and Children Act 2002. The complaint was closed because we did not find fault by the Council.

  • East Sussex County Council (18 007 726)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 09-Nov-2018

    Summary: Ms X complained that the Council failed to deal properly with her post-adoption support and her complaint about the matter. The Council was at fault in the way it dealt with her complaint. It has agreed to take her complaint to stage 2 of the children's social care complaints procedure. This is a satisfactory remedy. The Ombudsman has not investigated the complaint about the post-adoption support.