Adoption


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Royal Borough of Greenwich (20 001 124)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 29-Oct-2020

    Summary: The Council was at fault for delaying the progression of Mr C's complaint to stage 2 of the statutory complaint's procedure. However, it has apologised and is now progressing the complaint.

  • London Borough of Bromley (19 009 122)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 20-Oct-2020

    Summary: Ms B complains about the Council's decision not to progress an application she made to become an adoptive parent. We uphold the complaint finding several faults in the Council's process of decision making. These caused Ms B injustice as distress as the decision reached by the Council cannot be relied on as a result. At the end of this statement we set out action the Council has agreed to take to remedy that injustice.

  • Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (19 012 059)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 13-Oct-2020

    Summary: Mr B complains the Council failed to apply to renew an injunction to prevent the birth family of his wife's adopted daughter contacting her. He says that as a result the birth family were in touch with her and had a detrimental impact on her well-being, behaviour and education. He said the contact from the birth family also caused significant distress to the rest of the family. There was fault by the Council that caused injustice to Mr B. The Council will make a payment to Mr B.

  • Portsmouth City Council (19 020 046)

    Statement Not upheld Adoption 12-Oct-2020

    Summary: Mr X complains that the Council unreasonably stopped financial support for his adopted son in breach of a previous agreement and failed to respond adequately to his complaints. He also complains about comments made by Council staff. The complaint about the breach of the previous agreement has been made too late and there are no good reasons to investigate now. There is see no evidence of fault in the Council's decision to cease financial support or in the comments complained of.

  • Nottingham City Council (19 013 789)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 30-Sep-2020

    Summary: Mr Y and Mrs Z complain about the lack of financial support provided by the Council following the adoption of their daughter, whom I will call J. They also complain about the way the Council handled their complaint. The Ombudsman finds fault with the Council for wrongly stating that Mr Y and Mrs Z were eligible for adoption allowance payments, thus raising their expectations. The Council also delayed in sharing relevant information and documents with Mr Y and Mrs Z after their adoption of J. The Council will apologise and pay £200 for the time, trouble and worry caused by the fault.

  • Telford & Wrekin Council (19 009 491)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 25-Sep-2020

    Summary: The complainant alleges that the Council misled him and his wife about the possibility of future medical difficulties for a child, whom they had expressed an interest in adopting, prior to them agreeing the placement. The child was subsequently diagnosed with significant difficulties. The Ombudsman agreed to accept the complaint even though the Council had not considered the complaint at the final stage of the statutory complaint procedure. The Ombudsman finds fault causing injustice in the way the Council has managed the adoption and complaint processes. The Council has agreed the Ombudsman's findings and recommendations and therefore we are closing the complaint.

  • Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council (19 020 927)

    Statement Not upheld Adoption 28-Aug-2020

    Summary: it is too early for the Ombudsman to consider Ms M's complaint about financial support for her adopted son. The Council has agreed to consider Ms M's complaint under the formal procedure set out in law for children's complaints. We have also advised Ms M to complain to the Council for the area where she lives. Both Councils have a duty to cooperate to respond to her complaint. If she remains dissatisfied once both Councils have completed the three-stage complaints process, Ms M can complain to the Ombudsman again.

  • Northamptonshire County Council (19 015 098)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 08-Jul-2020

    Summary: Mr G complained the Council failed to arrange for its insurers to contact him so he could make a claim for unfair loss of income that the family sustained while fostering to adopt. There was fault in the significant delay in the insurers acting, which the Council did not oversee.

  • Kent County Council (19 005 075)

    Statement Not upheld Adoption 17-Feb-2020

    Summary: Mr X and Ms Y complained the Council did not provide appropriate support when two children were placed with them on an adoption placement. They said the lack of support led to the failure of the placement. They also said the Council's complaint investigation was flawed. There was no fault in how the Council considered their complaint under the children's statutory complaints procedure. As it appropriately considered the complaint, the Ombudsman will not re-investigate.

  • Wolverhampton City Council (19 008 563)

    Statement Upheld Adoption 12-Feb-2020

    Summary: Mr and Mrs C complained about delays and poor communication by the Council during the adoption of their second child, D. The Council accepts it was at fault and has offered to pay Mr and Mrs C £500.

Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.