Other


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Waverley Borough Council (25 019 477)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 21-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Councils handling of her business rates account. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

  • Newcastle upon Tyne City Council (25 019 717)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 19-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about business rates. This is because part of the complaint is late. It is unlikely that we will find fault with the remaining matters complained about.

  • Charnwood Borough Council (25 021 444)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 19-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about enforcement action for business rates. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Manchester City Council (25 002 068)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 15-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of a business rate account. The complaint is late and there is no good reason to investigate now.

  • Birmingham City Council (25 025 120)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 15-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about business rates liability. We do not have the power to investigate matters that have been decided by a court.

  • London Borough of Hackney (25 019 445)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 14-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Ms X’s business rates liability. This is because the courts are better placed to determine whether Ms X is liable and there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council in its billing and handling of Ms X’s accounts.

  • Telford & Wrekin Council (25 018 336)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 13-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about council tax recovery. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.

  • Peterborough City Council (25 019 506)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 12-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Business Rates’ liability because Mr and Mrs Y could have appealed to the Valuation Tribunal. It would also be reasonable for them to challenge the matter in the magistrates’ court. The complaint is also late.

  • London Borough of Wandsworth (25 016 991)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about business improvement district levy recovery action as it is unlikely we will find fault causing injustice to the complainant and part of the complaint is made late and there are not good reasons to investigate now.

  • Leicester City Council (25 018 251)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: Mr X complains he is not liable for the debt on a business rates account. We will not investigate this complaint because it is reasonable to have expected Mr X to have attended Court to dispute the Liability Order. The Court would have been better placed to make this decision.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings