Recent statements in this category are shown below:
-
Southend-on-Sea City Council (25 022 644)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 25-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council tax because there is a right of appeal to a valuation tribunal and the matter has been remedied.
-
Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council (25 027 792)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 25-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about council tax recovery action. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to justify our involvement.
-
Liverpool City Council (25 027 828)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 25-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about council tax liability and complaint handling. This is because the complaint is late and there is no good reason for this. Mr X can approach the Information Commissioner regarding his data handling complaints. It is not proportionate to investigate complaint handling in this case.
-
Birmingham City Council (26 004 522)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 25-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council tax liability because there was a right of appeal to a valuation tribunal.
-
North Northamptonshire Council (26 004 621)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 25-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council tax liability because there is a right of appeal to a valuation tribunal.
-
Nottingham City Council (25 005 326)
Statement Not upheld Council tax 25-Aug-2026
Summary: Mr X complained the Council used an address it knew he was not living in respect of council tax recovery action. The Council did not receive notification of Mr X’s new address and so used his last known address, which regulations allow it to do. There is no evidence of fault in respect of the Council using this address, but it did wrongly send correspondence to another address Mr X had not lived at for over 12 years.
-
Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (26 014 438)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 25-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council handled Mr X’s application for a council tax reduction, and his resulting complaint. Any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, and we could not add to the investigation the Council has already done.
-
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council (25 027 282)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 24-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s use of attachment of earnings orders to recover unpaid council tax. It would be reasonable for him to challenge his liability at the Valuation Tribunal or ask the county court to set aside any liability orders. There is not enough evidence of fault in Council’s use of attachment of earnings orders, and it is not responsible for calculating the amount of deductions by Mr X’s employer.
-
Breckland District Council (25 027 744)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 24-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about council tax. This is because Miss X’s complaint is late and she had a right of appeal she could have used. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigation into more recent matters .
-
Oxford City Council (25 027 868)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 24-Aug-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about poor communication. This is because any injustice is not significant enough to warrant an investigation.