Assessment and care plan


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Worcestershire County Council (24 018 517)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Assessment and care plan 07-Oct-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about not receiving any care and support services at home for four days. This is because we could not add to the investigation already carried out by the Council.

  • London Borough of Newham (24 023 491)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Assessment and care plan 07-Oct-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint that an officer of the Council imposed her own views during a carer’s meeting and made fun of Miss X. This is because the injustice complained of is not significant enough to warrant an investigation.

  • London Borough of Tower Hamlets (25 000 323)

    Statement Not upheld Assessment and care plan 07-Oct-2025

    Summary: Mrs X complained about the Council’s decision not to provide her with a home care package. She said the Council relied on incorrect information in making this decision. The Council was not at fault. It carried out Mrs X’s social care and needs assessment in line with relevant law and policy.

  • London Borough of Barnet (25 000 135)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Assessment and care plan 06-Oct-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s action in dealing with Mr X. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant our further involvement.

  • London Borough of Croydon (25 006 960)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Assessment and care plan 30-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s record-keeping because there is insufficient evidence of fault causing sufficient injustice to justify our involvement.

  • Nottinghamshire County Council (25 004 699)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Assessment and care plan 30-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about adult social care. There is not enough evidence of fault in how the Council investigated safeguarding concerns and meets care and support needs. The Ombudsman cannot question or criticise the Council’s decisions where there is no fault in how they were made. If the complainant disagrees with what is in the best interests of the person receiving care they can ask the Court of Protection to decide.

  • Leeds City Council (24 019 392)

    Statement Upheld Assessment and care plan 29-Sep-2025

    Summary: Mrs Y complained the Council wrongly assessed Mr X’s care needs and did not pay for his care. She says this caused her unnecessary distress and financial strain. We find the Council at fault which caused Mrs Y limited injustice. We find the action taken by the Council has remedied the injustice caused.

  • City of York Council (24 020 874)

    Statement Upheld Assessment and care plan 29-Sep-2025

    Summary: The Council was not at fault for failing to tell Ms X about its decision to extend her mother’s stay at a care home. The Council was at fault for not properly explaining the cost of a temporary stay in a care home. It has taken steps to rectify the costs so no remedy is recommended.

  • London Borough of Southwark (24 022 159)

    Statement Upheld Assessment and care plan 29-Sep-2025

    Summary: Miss X complained the Council did not complete a carer’s assessment for her and about how it has handled Miss Y’s care needs. We find the Council at fault for not completing a carer’s assessment for Miss X and for delays in arranging Miss Y’s care, causing uncertainty and frustration. The Council has agreed to apologise, offer Miss X a carer’s assessment and make a payment to recognise the injustice.

  • South Gloucestershire Council (24 023 112)

    Statement Upheld Assessment and care plan 29-Sep-2025

    Summary: Mrs E complained on behalf of her son Mr E that the Council’s social care assessments were delayed. And the Council did not agree to their request for a reasonable adjustment. We uphold the complaint because of the delay in the assessment and in checking Mr E’s communication needs. This will have caused Mr E some distress. The Council has agreed to our recommendations to remedy this fault and to review its procedures.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings