Decision search
Your search has 53256 results
-
London Borough of Lewisham (25 003 680)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 19-Jun-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about matters related to the Council’s data handling. This is because the Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to respond to Ms X’s complaint.
-
Staffordshire County Council (25 003 691)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 19-Jun-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an alleged breach of personal information. The Information Commissioner’s Officer is better placed to deal with the complaint.
-
Durham County Council (24 022 971)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 19-Jun-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about failure in the way the Council considered a planning application. We do not consider the complainant has suffered a significant personal injustice which warrants our involvement.
-
North Somerset Council (24 022 991)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 19-Jun-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the special educational needs provision made for Mrs X’s child. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions to warrant our further involvement.
-
Hampshire County Council (24 023 093)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 19-Jun-2025
Summary: We cannot investigate Mrs X complaint about the contents of an Education Health and Care Plan. This is because she has used her right of appeal to the SEND Tribunal.
-
London Borough of Tower Hamlets (25 000 208)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 19-Jun-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about traffic and parking management because any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.
-
Wakefield City Council (25 000 404)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 19-Jun-2025
Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council offering him only programmes for domestic abuse perpetrators rather than a course for male victims or survivors of domestic abuse as this matter could reasonably have been mentioned during court proceedings concerning the care of his child. A permanent legal bar prevents us investigating the complaint.
-
London Borough of Tower Hamlets (24 008 582)
Statement Upheld Homelessness 19-Jun-2025
Summary: The Council was at fault for delays completing statutory reviews of its decisions about Ms Y’s homelessness and housing allocations. It was also at fault for wrongly recording the gender of one of Ms Y’s children. This meant she could not bid for the size of property she needed, which is an injustice. The Council was further at fault for making its offer of a remedy conditional on Ms Y not pursuing her complaint. The Council has agreed to apologise, make payments, backdate Ms Y’s housing application and act to improve its services.
-
London Borough of Croydon (24 010 129)
Statement Upheld Alternative provision 19-Jun-2025
Summary: Mx X complains the Council did not deal properly with her daughter Y’s education because it did not provide alternative education and she says Y lost education provision. The Council did not properly consider whether it should provide s19 alternative education for Y. Y suffered loss of educational provision and opportunity for 3 months. The Council should apologise and Pay Mx X £1,800 for loss of education provision.
-
Teignbridge District Council (24 013 288)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 19-Jun-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a complaint about the conduct of a councillor. This is because we are unlikely to find enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.