Local Government Ombudsman Logo

www.lgo.org.uk has experienced a problem

The website has encountered an error. The issue has been logged so that we can investigate the cause.

You can visit the home page and try browsing again. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused.

You may still be able to use our online complaint service if you want to register a complaint or log into your account.

SearchResult - Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 52604 results

  • Thanet District Council (24 007 662)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Refuse and recycling 20-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about household waste collections. This is because an investigation would be unlikely to add anything to the Council’s response or lead to a different outcome.

  • Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council (24 008 380)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Health and safety 20-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a delay in concluding an investigation into breaches of health and safety legislation at a gym. We consider that further investigation by us now will not lead to a different outcome.

  • London Borough of Haringey (24 008 564)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 20-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s delays in returning private sector leased properties to their owners. It is reasonable for the landlords to seek a legal remedy for breach of lease agreements in the courts.

  • Stoke-on-Trent City Council (24 008 576)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 20-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council has not provided a three bedroom home. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council and because there were review rights the complainant could have used.

  • Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (24 008 587)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 20-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council allegedly breaching a contract by unlawfully taking and using confidential information and employing a former employee of Mr X’s organisation. The matters complained of are ones where it would be reasonable for Mr X to use his right to go to court.

  • Redcar & Cleveland Council (24 008 613)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 20-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s involvement in relation to an allegation from a sub-contractor involving Mr X. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council to warrant an investigation.

  • London Borough of Camden (24 008 705)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Trees 20-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council are responsible for damage to property while work was carried out to a nearby tree. This is because it is reasonable for the complainant to pursue their compensation claim through the courts.

  • London Borough of Haringey (24 008 726)

    Statement Upheld Allocations 20-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the complainant’s priority on the housing register because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. We will not investigate the complaint about delayed responses because the Council provided a satisfactory response.

  • Nuneaton & Bedworth Borough Council (24 008 760)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 20-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council not maintaining a piece of land. This is because there is no sign of fault by the Council.

  • Ashfield District Council (24 008 766)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 20-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s planning process and decision to grant permission for a residential development near his property. The complaint is late and there are no good reasons to investigate it now. Even if we were to investigate, there is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s planning process to warrant us investigating.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings