Local Government Ombudsman Logo

www.lgo.org.uk has experienced a problem

The website has encountered an error. The issue has been logged so that we can investigate the cause.

You can visit the home page and try browsing again. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused.

You may still be able to use our online complaint service if you want to register a complaint or log into your account.

SearchResult - Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

Decision search

What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 55054 results

  • Halton Borough Council (24 004 836)

    Statement Upheld School exclusions 09-Jun-2025

    Summary: Ms F complained about the Council’s handling of the Education, Health and Care plan process for her son (X) since 2018 and his education. We found fault by the Council for failing to adhere to the statutory process and timescales, ensure X received the education he was entitled to, and how it communicated with Ms F. We did not investigate parts of the complaint as these were late. The Council should apologise and make payment to acknowledge the injustice it caused.

  • Liverpool City Council (24 005 070)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Licensing 09-Jun-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council failed to take sufficient action against an ice cream van operator for breaches of their licence conditions. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council or to show its actions caused the injustice Miss X claims.

  • London Borough of Haringey (24 005 190)

    Statement Upheld Allocations 09-Jun-2025

    Summary: Ms X complained the Council delayed in considering her housing allocation band after she provided new evidence. The Council took too long to consider this, but there was no fault which calls into question the banding outcome. The Council already apologised to Ms X for delays, which is sufficient to remedy the injustice caused.

  • Promedica24 (Lancashire) Limited (24 006 336)

    Statement Not upheld Domiciliary care 09-Jun-2025

    Summary: Mr A complained that the care provider failed to keep his mother Mrs X safe in her home. In particular he complains that the live-in carer was unaware Mrs X had left the house alone in the night, or had put liquid soap in her own food. The evidence shows the care provider took appropriate action to address the incidents but the family chose to terminate the contract.

  • London Borough of Barnet (24 007 489)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 09-Jun-2025

    Summary: Mr X complained the Council did not fully deliver provision set out in his son’s Education, Health and Care Plan, or carry out its annual review on time. We found fault because his son did not receive all of the provision linked to his plan in the 12 months after it was first issued and the annual review did not take place in a timely manner. This caused Mr X avoidable distress, frustration and uncertainty. It also meant his son did not access the services he should have done. To remedy the injustice caused, the Council has agreed to apologise to Mr X, makes a payment to him, organise catch up sessions for his son and complete the annual review of his plan.

  • London Borough of Lewisham (24 009 457)

    Statement Upheld Homelessness 09-Jun-2025

    Summary: The Council was at fault for delays and poor communication regarding repair issues Ms X raised regarding her temporary accommodation. The Council has agreed to apologise and make a payment to Ms X to acknowledge the additional frustration and distress caused, beyond that already remedied through its complaint responses. It has also agreed to review its procedures for responding to repeated issues of disrepair in temporary accommodation and for communicating effectively with tenants about the issues.

  • Dorset Council (24 009 873)

    Statement Upheld Alternative provision 09-Jun-2025

    Summary: Ms X complained the Council failed to arrange suitable alternative provision and all the special educational needs provision in her child, Y’s, Education, Health and Care Plan. Ms X said this distressed her, caused her financial difficulty and Y missed education and provision. There was fault in the way the Council did not ensure Y received education and plan provision. Y missed education and plan provision for one academic term. The Council has agreed to apologise, make a financial payment and issue guidance to its staff.

  • Suffolk County Council (24 010 672)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 09-Jun-2025

    Summary: The Council failed to arrange the transitional support that Ms X’s child, G, needed when they started school. The Council also failed to communicate with Ms X properly, delayed consulting alternative schools and delayed issuing G’s Education Health and Care Plan. The Council’s faults caused G to miss out on a term of transitional support and caused Ms X and G frustration and uncertainty. To recognise the injustice caused, the Council has agreed to apologise, pay Ms X £800 and take action to improve its services.

  • Worcestershire County Council (24 010 933)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Residential care 09-Jun-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the care her late father Mr Y received from a Council-commissioned care home. The main injustice would be to Mr Y, who has died so we cannot provide them with any remedy. While it is upsetting for Miss X, there is not remaining significant injustice to justify us investigating.

  • Warwickshire County Council (24 011 420)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 09-Jun-2025

    Summary: Miss X complains about the annual review of her child’s Education, Health and Care Plan. There was fault. The Council delayed finalising the Plan after the annual review and there were delays in the Council’s complaints process. It is unlikely that Y would have changed schools earlier if the fault had not occurred but the delays led to distress and uncertainty for Miss X. The Council apologised and revised procedures before the complaint was considered by the Ombudsman, but a payment in addition to this remedies the injustice.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings