Decision search
Your search has 30 results
-
Sedgemoor District Council (22 006 829)
Statement Not upheld Enforcement 11-Jan-2023
Summary: The complainants Ms X, Ms A, Mr B and Mr C (the Residents) said the Council failed to follow the right process when considering planning application for a major development in their neighbourhood. They also complained about the Council’s actions regarding monitoring and enforcement of the planning conditions attached to the approved planning application. We do not find fault in the way the Council carried out planning control. The remaining part of this complaint is late.
-
Sedgemoor District Council (22 011 553)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Building control 13-Dec-2022
Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of a building control matter. This is because the Council’s actions have not caused Ms X significant injustice.
-
Sedgemoor District Council (22 009 220)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 25-Oct-2022
Summary: We cannot not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision on the level of fire detection system Mr X is required to install in his HMO (House in Multiple Occupation) property. This is because Mr X used appeal rights to the Tribunal which places the complaint outside our jurisdiction.
-
Sedgemoor District Council (21 015 858)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 20-Sep-2022
Summary: Mrs F complains the Council failed to take planning enforcement action after she reported breaches of planning conditions on a development site next to her home. We have found no fault in the way the Council decided not to take enforcement action.
-
Sedgemoor District Council (22 001 724)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 17-May-2022
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision not to remove a planning Enforcement Notice (EN) from his land, its refusal of his Certificate of Lawful Development (CLEUD) application, and its pre-application planning advice. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s retention of the EN, or of significant injustice to Mr X caused by the decision, to warrant investigation. Mr X has the right of appeal against the CLEUD refusal, which it is reasonable for him to use. There is not enough evidence of Council fault in its pre-application planning advice process, or of injustice caused to Mr X by the advice, to justify investigation.
-
Sedgemoor District Council (21 018 621)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 07-Apr-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the grant of outline planning permission for a development near the complainant’s home. This is because the decision was made by a body out of jurisdiction.
-
Sedgemoor District Council (21 012 076)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 15-Feb-2022
Summary: Mr X complains about the Council’s failings in its handling of a neighbour’s planning application. We will not investigate the complaint because it is unlikely we will add to the investigation already carried out by the Council and an investigation is unlikely to lead to a different outcome.
-
Sedgemoor District Council (21 009 822)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 11-Feb-2022
Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her neighbour’s planning application. This is because there is no evidence to show it is to blame for the delay in Mrs X receiving her consultation letter and it properly considered the impact of the proposed development in any case.
-
Sedgemoor District Council (21 008 964)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Private housing 09-Nov-2021
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with repair issues in her private rented property. This is because there is no evidence the Council’s actions caused her an injustice.
-
Sedgemoor District Council (21 000 515)
Statement Not upheld Councillor conduct and standards 14-Sep-2021
Summary: Mr D disagrees with the outcome of a Code of Conduct investigation by the Council. The Ombudsman has discontinued the complaint because he cannot achieve the outcome sought by Mr D.