Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 54045 results

  • Devon County Council (25 008 402)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 07-Oct-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council refusing to assess her child for an Education, Health and Care Plan. This is because it was reasonable for Mrs X to appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability).

  • Gravesham Borough Council (25 008 516)

    Statement Upheld Allocations 07-Oct-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about her suspension from the housing register. This is because, at our invitation, the Council agreed to conduct a new internal appeal to consider Mrs X’s suspension. We consider this a suitable remedy.

  • Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council (25 008 775)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 07-Oct-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with the complainant’s planning application. This is because the complainant had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector.

  • Essex County Council (25 008 944)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 07-Oct-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about delay in the Education and Health Care Plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to remedy the injustice caused by its delay and it is unlikely further investigation would achieve significantly more for Miss X. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to name a school in her son’s Education, Health and Care Plan because the decision carried a right of appeal which it would have been reasonable for her to use.

  • Slough Borough Council (25 008 994)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 07-Oct-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application and the pre-application planning advice it provided. This is because the complainant had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector. It is unlikely we would find fault and the complainant has not suffered significant injustice in relation to the remaining issues complained about.

  • Kingston Upon Hull City Council (25 009 047)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 07-Oct-2025

    Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council shared his personal information with a third party in 2021 against data protection regulations. This is because Mr X has taken the matter to court.

  • Gedling Borough Council (25 010 052)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Refuse and recycling 07-Oct-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint that the Council failed to collect her garden waste on one occasion in July 2025. The claimed injustice is not significant enough to warrant an investigation.

  • London Borough of Southwark (25 012 910)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 07-Oct-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council tax enforcement because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. Mr X has a right of appeal to a Valuation Tribunal about the application of an empty homes premium and a right of appeal to a Land Tribunal against an Empty Dwelling Management Order.

  • Milton Keynes Council (25 013 957)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Refuse and recycling 07-Oct-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint about the Council emptying a bin he had not put out for collection. This is because Mr B has not suffered a serious or significant injustice which would justify our involvement.

  • City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (25 014 579)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 07-Oct-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Council tax empty homes premium because there is a right of appeal to a Valuation Tribunal.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings