Environment and regulation archive 2021-2022


Archive has 1192 results

  • Sunderland City Council (21 015 984)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Licensing 04-Mar-2022

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council will not take action to prevent a catering van trading on an industrial estate. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant our further involvement.

  • Transport for London (21 003 359)

    Statement Upheld Other 04-Mar-2022

    Summary: Mr C said Transport for London was at fault for a failure to inform him testing of taxis had resumed after a pause caused by COVID-19. Transport for London was at fault. It said it would contact Mr C when the pause ended. It did not do so. Nor did it tell him of an extended deadline which would have allowed him to renew his taxi licence. This caused Mr C injustice. he was caused significant distress as he could not pay his bills or work. Transport for London has agreed to pay Mr C £999 to remedy the injustice found.

  • Birmingham City Council (21 016 702)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Refuse and recycling 04-Mar-2022

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council not dealing with her complaint regarding her neighbour receiving assisted bin collections. The Council providing that service to her neighbour does not cause Mrs X a significant personal injustice warranting an investigation. We do not investigate councils’ complaints handling where we are not investigating the core issue giving rise to the complaint.

  • Leeds City Council (21 005 937)

    Statement Not upheld Other 03-Mar-2022

    Summary: the complainant, Mr X complained the Council failed to properly exercise its enforcement powers to prevent and remove mud and dust collecting on the public highway. The Council says it considered its powers, investigated the complaints, and issued a statutory notice. It accepts some delay arose due to Covid-19. We found the Council considered and exercised its enforcement powers without fault.

  • Leeds City Council (21 015 886)

    Statement Upheld Trading standards 03-Mar-2022

    Summary: Mrs X says the Council’s delay in investigating her complaint led to a company going into liquidation. This means she cannot get her money back. The Council is at fault because of the delays in its response. However, this failing did not cause Mrs X significant personal injustice which warrants our involvement.

  • Bassetlaw District Council (21 016 389)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Licensing 03-Mar-2022

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the wording in the license for a permanent mobile home site. That is because the Council has already agreed to review the wording therefore further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

  • Maidstone Borough Council (21 016 446)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Refuse and recycling 03-Mar-2022

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s missed collection of Mrs X’s household waste on one occasion. There is insufficient evidence of any significant injustice which would warrant an investigation.

  • Manchester City Council (21 016 074)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 03-Mar-2022

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council responded to reports of a possible statutory nuisance. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. The complaint is late and could have been made to the Ombudsman much sooner. Even if the complaint was not late, we would not investigate. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant an investigation.

  • Sheffield City Council (20 011 499)

    Statement Upheld Noise 03-Mar-2022

    Summary: Mr D complained the Council has failed to take appropriate action when he raised concerns about air and noise pollution from idling buses near to where he lives. We find the Council was at fault as it failed to consider its duties under the Environmental Protection Act 1990. The Council has agreed to our recommendations to address Mr D’s injustice.

  • Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (21 014 325)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Refuse and recycling 02-Mar-2022

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about nuisance caused by waste bins placed near Ms X’s window. This is because the Council is continuing to consider the matter and whether it has any legal remit to become involved.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings