School admissions archive 2020-2021


Archive has 150 results

  • Southampton City Council (19 018 129)

    Statement Not upheld School admissions 02-Sep-2020

    Summary: There is no fault in the Council’s consideration of Ms B’s request that her son be allowed a decelerated start in Reception year of primary school in 2021

  • North Lincolnshire Council (20 001 445)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School admissions 27-Aug-2020

    Summary: The Ombudsman does not have reason to investigate this complaint from a parent about the school admission appeal panel’s decision to turn down her appeal regarding a school place for her son. This is because there is no sign of fault in the appeal arrangements or the way the panel made its decision.

  • London Borough of Lambeth (20 001 763)

    Statement Upheld School admissions 27-Aug-2020

    Summary: The Council did not provide clear information to Ms B about how to apply for her daughter to start school early, before she was four years old. The Council also misplaced Ms B’s first application, and when she applied again, it failed to obtain and consider the headteacher’s views before deciding to refuse the application. The Council has agreed to apologise, reconsider Ms B’s application and review the information it provides to parents about the process.

  • St Damian's RC Science College, Ashton-under-Lyne (20 002 137)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School admissions 27-Aug-2020

    Summary: A parent complained about the school admission appeal panel’s decision to refuse her appeal concerning a school place for her son. But there is no sign that any fault by the panel caused the parent an injustice to warrant the Ombudsman starting an investigation of the matter.

  • Maidstone Grammar School For Girls (20 002 242)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School admissions 25-Aug-2020

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about an Independent Appeal Panel refusing a school place. This is because it is unlikely we would find evidence of fault in how the Panel reached its decision.

  • West Sussex County Council (20 002 621)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School admissions 25-Aug-2020

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about an unsuccessful appeal for a school place. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the panel, and so we cannot question the merits of its decision.

  • Nottingham City Council (20 002 838)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School admissions 24-Aug-2020

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about an unsuccessful school admissions appeal. This is because he is unlikely to determine an injustice following minor fault by the school admissions appeals panel.

  • London Borough of Redbridge (19 012 393)

    Statement Upheld School admissions 21-Aug-2020

    Summary: Ms X complains about an unsuccessful school admissions appeal. The Ombudsman has found fault with the way this appeal was conducted. To remedy the injustice caused, the Council has agreed with the Ombudsman’s recommendation to offer Ms X a fresh appeal.

  • London Borough of Redbridge (19 012 394)

    Statement Upheld School admissions 21-Aug-2020

    Summary: Ms X complains about an unsuccessful school admissions appeal. The Ombudsman has found fault with the way this appeal was conducted. To remedy the injustice caused, the Council has agreed with the Ombudsman’s recommendation to offer Ms X a fresh appeal.

  • Blue School, Isleworth (20 001 831)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School admissions 21-Aug-2020

    Summary: A parent complained about a school’s decision to rank his application for a school place under its lowest admission criterion, and its failure to adjust his child’s position on the waiting list in view of comments the head teacher made at an admission appeals hearing. But the Ombudsman does not have reason to investigate this complaint because there is no sign of fault in the way the school and the independent appeal panel dealt with the matter.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings