Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Environment and regulation archive 2019-2020

Archive has 1048 results

  • Birmingham City Council (19 019 986)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Refuse and recycling 31-Mar-2020

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms B's complaint about the Council not returning her refuse bin to the edge of her property. This is because it is unlikely we could add anything to the Council's response or achieve a different outcome for Ms B.

  • London Borough of Lewisham (19 019 722)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Trees 31-Mar-2020

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Miss X's complaint the Council's tree is damaging her gate and fence. The complaint is late. Also, she can ask the courts to decide whether the Council is liable for the damage.

  • Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council (19 010 154)

    Statement Not upheld Antisocial behaviour 31-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mr C complained the Council failed to investigate properly and take appropriate action in response to his reports of smoke nuisance. Mr C says he suffered from unacceptable levels of smoke and fumes which affected the amenity of his property for longer than necessary. The Ombudsman has found no evidence of fault.

  • Cornwall Council (19 006 665)

    Statement Not upheld Drainage 31-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mr B complains that the Council has failed to use its powers under the Land Drainage Act 1991 to reinstate an ordinary watercourse resulting in his property being at risk of flooding. The Ombudsman finds no grounds to criticise the Council's decision that use of its powers was not warranted in this case.

  • North Devon District Council (19 006 069)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Refuse and recycling 30-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council's refuse collectors leaving bins obstructing his driveway on occasions since 2017. The Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of significant injustice which would warrant an investigation by the Ombudsman.

  • Suffolk County Council (19 016 956)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Trees 30-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mr and Mrs X complained about the Council's refusal to remove a tree from the highway which is close to their property boundary. The Ombudsman should not exercise his discretion to investigate this complaint. This is because it concerns a complaint about matters outside the normal 12-month period for receiving complaints.

  • Mole Valley District Council (19 013 068)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 30-Mar-2020

    Summary: The Ombudsman cannot investigate Mr X's complaint that the Council wrongly served an abatement notice on him for noise nuisance. The complaint is outside the Ombudsman's jurisdiction because Mr X used his right of appeal to court.

  • Plymouth City Council (19 011 709)

    Statement Not upheld Trees 30-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mrs X complains the Council was at fault in the way it responded to her concerns about overgrown vegetation and overhanging trees near to her property. The Ombudsman has found no evidence of fault in the way the Council considered these matters.

  • Birmingham City Council (19 011 345)

    Statement Not upheld Other 30-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mr X complains the Council did not respond to his requests for information in a timely manner and before a planning committee meeting. Mr X contacted the Council three days before the meeting asking for the information. The information shows the Council responded as quickly as it could and within one week of the initial request. There is no evidence of fault by the Council in the time taken to provide the requested information.

  • Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council (19 020 215)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Trading standards 30-Mar-2020

    Summary: Miss X complains the Council seized her stock and is prosecuting her based on a false complaint. The Ombudsman cannot investigate this complaint as matters subject to court proceedings are outside his jurisdiction.