Transport and highways archive 2017-2018


Archive has 1181 results

  • Transport for London (17 018 279)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Public transport 29-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about a £50 refund that was given to the complainant in error and about general delay. This is because the complainant does not have to repay the £50 and there is insufficient injustice to warrant investigation.

  • Sunderland City Council (17 003 591)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 29-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about how the Council introduced a controlled parking zone. It is unlikely he would find evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Essex County Council (17 018 831)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway repair and maintenance 29-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Miss X's complaint about the Council's failure to maintain a public highway. If Miss X considers the Council is liable for damage to her car it would be reasonable for her to take the matter to court.

  • Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (17 008 151)

    Statement Not upheld Parking and other penalties 29-Mar-2018

    Summary: There is no evidence of fault in the way the Council responded to Mr B about an unpaid Penalty Charge Notice.

  • Leeds City Council (17 018 676)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 29-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that the Council will not introduce a speed restriction and place signs which the complainant believes are necessary. We are unlikely to find fault in how the Council has responded to the complainant's concerns.

  • London Borough of Bromley (17 019 028)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 29-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about a penalty charge notice issued by the Council for a parking contravention. The Council has refunded money paid by the complainant without him needing to appeal to a tribunal. The Ombudsman cannot provide the outcome the complainant seeks which is action against the officer who issued the penalty charge notice.

  • Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council (17 019 268)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 29-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint about the Council introducing a parking restriction (double yellow lines) near his property. There is insufficient evidence of fault.

  • Aylesbury Vale District Council (17 018 377)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 29-Mar-2018

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council enforcing parking controls on some land which he says is not public highway. The Ombudsman will not exercise his discretion to investigate this complaint which was received out of time. It was reasonable for Mr X to complain to the highway authority in 2015.

  • West Sussex County Council (17 018 706)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway repair and maintenance 29-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint about how the Council has dealt with reports of damage to a grass verge close to his home. An investigation is unlikely to find fault with the Council and Mr X has not been caused significant personal injustice.

  • Transport for London (17 012 374)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 28-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about a delay by the Authority in processing the complainant's private hire taxi licence and making a refund. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Authority.