Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Environment and regulation archive 2017-2018

Archive has 567 results

  • Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council (17 007 346)

    Statement Not upheld Other 29-Mar-2018

    Summary: There was no fault by the Council in a complaint alleging it harassed the complainant over the alleged abandonment of his vehicle on private land.

  • Leeds City Council (17 018 728)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Health and safety 29-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint about the Council's refusal to take action over his neighbour's solar panels. This is because an investigation is unlikely to find fault with the Council and there is no evidence Mr X has been caused significant personal injustice.

  • East Riding of Yorkshire Council (17 010 856)

    Statement Upheld Other 29-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman found fault with the Council's failure to explain why it considered the complainant was no longer suitable to operate a bus service. This meant the complainant was not given an opportunity to make a proper appeal against the decision. The Council agreed to apologise for this fault and give the complainant a further opportunity to appeal.

  • Staffordshire County Council (17 013 327)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 29-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint about photographs taken by a Council officer and used in court proceedings. This is because we cannot investigate complaints about information used in court proceedings.

  • East Riding of Yorkshire Council (17 018 383)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Trees 29-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint about the Council's decision not to prosecute a property developer for carrying out unauthorised work on a tree in a conservation area. It is unlikely an investigation by the Ombudsman would find fault with the way the Council reached its decision and so we cannot question its merits.

  • Coventry City Council (17 011 480)

    Statement Upheld Refuse and recycling 28-Mar-2018

    Summary: The complaint is about missed assisted bin collections over an extended period. We have upheld the complaint. The Council has agreed a period of monitoring as a remedy. And a token payment to recognise the distress and time and trouble the faults led to.

  • Wiltshire Council (17 011 507)

    Statement Not upheld Noise 28-Mar-2018

    Summary: Mr X complained about the way the Council investigated his complaints of noise from a neighbour's aviary and the way it reached its decision that the noise was not a statutory nuisance. The Ombudsman has found no evidence of fault in the way the Council investigated these matters.

  • Salford City Council (17 015 493)

    Statement Not upheld Pollution 28-Mar-2018

    Summary: There is no personal injustice to the complainant, in the Council's handling of reports about fly-tipping and vermin on an abandoned industrial site. For this reason, the Ombudsman has discontinued his investigation.

  • London Borough of Newham (17 009 020)

    Statement Upheld Antisocial behaviour 28-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Council failed to respond to some of Ms B's telephone contacts about anti-social behaviour by a neighbour. The Council will apologise to Ms B for her frustration, time and trouble.

  • Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council (17 009 905)

    Statement Upheld Noise 28-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Council was at fault in the way it handled complaints of noise from an industrial estate. It gave wrong advice about making complaints, delayed responding to reports of a new noise issue and failed to respond to a request for information. The Council will apologise to Mr and Mrs X and confirm how it will investigate any future complaints about noise from the industrial estate.