Archive has 225 results
-
Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (20 006 265)
Statement Upheld Planning applications 31-Mar-2021
Summary: The Council was at fault for the way it handled a planning application for a glazed door as it approved the plan before the end of the consultation period. This did not cause any significant injustice to Mr X, so no remedy is necessary.
-
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 31-Mar-2021
Summary: Mr X complains about the Council’s handling of a planning obligation it agreed prior to a decision on a planning appeal made to the Planning Inspector. We will not investigate the complaint because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council which caused him injustice.
-
Richmondshire District Council (20 012 529)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 31-Mar-2021
Summary: Mr X complains about the Council’s refusal of his planning application. We will not investigate this complaint because he can appeal to a Planning Inspector.
-
City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (20 012 542)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Building control 31-Mar-2021
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a building control matter. This is because it is unlikely an investigation could achieve the outcome the complainant wants.
-
Plymouth City Council (20 011 203)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 31-Mar-2021
Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaints about the Council’s decision to recommend approval of a planning application to make permanent an earlier temporary permission for a commercial garage near her home, and about the planning committee’s decision to grant the permission. There is not enough evidence of fault in the planning process to warrant our investigating.
-
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (20 011 452)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 31-Mar-2021
Summary: I have seen no evidence of fault in the Council’s actions prior to its decisions not to pursue enforcement action against the complainant’s neighbour. The Council investigated the complaint and confirmed not all matters in the enforcement notice were completed. However, it told the complainant it would not take further action as the main issue in the Enforcement Notice had been complied with. And the decking is not raised, and the harm caused (if any) is insignificant.
-
Bassetlaw District Council (20 011 581)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 31-Mar-2021
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about damage caused to the complainant’s property by works to a nearby development. This is because it is unlikely an investigation would achieve the outcome the complainant wants. The complainant can also seek a remedy in court for the claimed injustice.
-
Mole Valley District Council (20 011 813)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 31-Mar-2021
Summary: Miss X complains about the Council’s handling of a neighbour’s planning application. We do not intend to investigate the complaint because it is unlikely we could add to any previous investigation by the Council, and we cannot achieve the outcome Miss X seeks.
-
East Riding of Yorkshire Council (20 011 912)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 31-Mar-2021
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a breach of planning control or a retrospective planning application. This is because we are unlikely to find fault and the complainant has not been caused significant injustice.
-
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 31-Mar-2021
Summary: Mr Y complains on behalf of Ms Q about the Council’s handling of two planning applications and a planning enforcement investigation. We will not investigate concerns about the first planning application because the complaint about it is too late. In our view, there is no evidence of procedural fault in the other matters complained about, or they caused little or no injustice to Ms Q, so we have not investigated them further. The Council’s apology for the fault identified in its handling of Mr Y’s complaint is sufficient and we do not propose anything further.