Service improvements

Surrey County Council

Showing service improvements between 1 April 2023 and 31 March 2024

Find out more about service improvements

When we find fault, we can recommend improvements to systems and processes where they haven’t worked properly, so that others do not suffer from these same problems in future. Common examples are policy changes; procedural reviews; and staff training. Service improvements from decisions are published for 5 years and those from reports are published for 10 years.

Showing 1 - 5 of 5 cases with service improvements

Export results (CSV)

Downloads the current filtered list of service improvement decisions for Surrey County Council as a CSV file.

  • Surrey County Council (23 005 853)

    Category: Adult care services Date: 13-Dec-2023

    Summary

    Mr X complained about the Council’s failure to keep under review the best interest decision it made about his mother’s care in 2022. The Council was at fault. It was also at fault for not giving him proper information about paying for the costs of care. It will apologise and pay him £1,000 to remedy the considerable stress and worry caused when it later said it may not fund his mother’s care package, and his avoidable time and trouble pursuing the matter. It will also give guidance to relevant staff.

    Service improvements

    The Council will remind relevant staff of the importance of giving full information about paying for the costs of care, including information about how a person's contribution to those costs will be calculated, and about personal budgets and what happens if a person chooses a care home or care package that exceeds this.The Council will remind relevant staff of the importance of ensuring that bests interests decision are kept under review.The Council will remind relevant staff of the importance of not setting arbitrary limits on the amount it will pay for a person's care and ensuring that in reaching decisions on any potential changes to their care, such as moving them to a care home or a cheaper care home, it assesses the likely impact of the proposed change on the person's wellbeing.

  • Surrey County Council (23 001 315)

    Category: Adult care services Date: 02-Feb-2024

    Summary

    Mrs X complained about how the Council dealt with a safeguarding investigation about the care and support provided to her adult child, Ms Y. There were some faults with the Council’s safeguarding enquiry process. This caused injustice to Ms Y and Mrs X. The Council will take action to remedy the injustice caused.

    Service improvements

    By training or other means remind staff of the Council’s referral processes to its commissioned advocacy services. This is to ensure people are appropriately referred to and have access to independent advocacy in line with the provisions of the Care Act 2014.By training or other means remind staff of the importance of providing information about its safeguarding enquiry process and communicating outcomes to the service user and/or representative(s) in a timely manner.

  • Surrey County Council (23 001 210)

    Category: Adult care services Date: 24-Nov-2023

    Summary

    We have upheld Mrs Y’s complaints about the way Surrey County Council (the Council) and NCH Surrey Heartlands Integrated Care Board (the ICB) dealt with her brother Mr X’s care and communicated with her family. We have recommended remedies for Mrs Y and four family members. We have also recommended service improvements to prevent similar faults affecting others. The Council and ICB have accepted our recommendations, so we have completed our investigation.

    Service improvements

    The Council will review its handling of this complaint and related communications that indicates safeguarding concerns. It will then share any lessons learned from the review in anonymised format with the appropriate teams.The Council and the NHS Integrated Care Board (ICB) will jointly review, and if necessary update, the systems and protocols they have in place for transferring care responsibilities from one organisation to another. This should include risk management and information sharing, both at the point of transfer and during any lead-in or transition period.

  • Surrey County Council (22 016 125)

    Category: Adult care services Date: 22-Aug-2023

    Summary

    Mr X complained the Council failed to ensure a young person, Miss W, continued to receive adult social care support and special educational provision when she moved into its area. The Council was at fault failing to ensure Miss W did not experience a break in her care services. This caused Miss W undue upset and Mr X avoidable frustration. The Council will apologise to them both, pay Mr X £400 total in recognition of that injustice, and review this complaint to identify points for learning and improvement. There was no fault in how the Council secured Miss W’s special educational provision.

    Service improvements

    The Council was at fault failing to ensure a young person did not experience a break in care services when she moved into its area. The Council will review the events in this case relating to continuity of care and in particular, the Council's communication with the other council involved in this complaint. It will also review the lack of staff awareness on the continuity of care duties as evidenced in this case. It will identify areas for learning and training and will send the Ombudsman an action plan setting out how it intends to address those shortcomingsThe Council will review how it communicated with the young person's representative from April to December 2022 and will identify areas for learning and training. It will send the Ombudsman an action plan setting out how it intends to address those shortcomings.

  • Surrey County Council (22 004 105)

    Category: Adult care services Date: 06-Sep-2023

    Summary

    We found fault by a Trust with regards to how it handled concerns about Mrs P’s mental health. The Trust will apologise to Mrs P and take action to prevent similar problems occurring in future. We also found fault by the Council with regards to the record keeping of its Mental Health Duty Team. However, we found no fault with the care provided by that team or the Approved Mental Health Practitioner service.

    Service improvements

    The Council will provide the Ombudsmen with a copy of its revised record-keeping guidance for staff, along with the accompanying email from the Caldicott Guardian.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings