Service improvements

Suffolk County Council

Showing service improvements between 1 April 2021 and 31 March 2022

Find out more about service improvements

When we find fault, we can recommend improvements to systems and processes where they haven’t worked properly, so that others do not suffer from these same problems in future. Common examples are policy changes; procedural reviews; and staff training. Service improvements from decisions are published for 5 years and those from reports are published for 10 years.

Showing 1 - 10 of 20 cases with service improvements

Export results (CSV)

Downloads the current filtered list of service improvement decisions for Suffolk County Council as a CSV file.

  • Suffolk County Council (21 007 265)

    Category: Education Date: 03-Mar-2022

    Summary

    Ms X complained the Council failed to ensure provisions in an Education, Health and Care plan for her daughter, Y, were met. She also complained the Council delayed in securing Y a new school placement. This caused the family financial stress and Y missed out on education. We found the Council at fault and recommended it apologise to Ms X, pay her £2400 for loss of education; £500 for distress; £300 for delay and act to prevent recurrence.

    Service improvements

    The Council agreed to provide training to special educational needs staff to ensure awareness of the Council's legal duties under the Education Act 1996 and the expectations set out in the Ombudsman's focus report.

  • Suffolk County Council (21 005 081)

    Category: Education Date: 11-Feb-2022

    Summary

    Mrs X complains about the Council’s failure to name a secondary specialist school placement in her grandson’s education, health, and care plan. We find fault with the Council for delays in issuing a final amended EHC plan in 2020. We also find fault with the Council for not issuing a final amended EHC plan in 2021.

    Service improvements

    The Council will remind relevant staff of the importance of issuing EHC plans within the timescales set out in the code of practice.

  • Suffolk County Council (21 003 447)

    Category: Adult care services Date: 08-Mar-2022

    Summary

    Mr X complained on behalf of Mr Y about the Council’s changes to his direct payment and support plan when it removed mileage costs and acupuncture. He said this caused Mr Y much stress and it created a shortfall in his account. We find the Council was not at fault in deciding not to fund these, but it did not make this clear to Mr Y in the case of the mileage costs for years. The Council has agreed to apologise and backdate the allowance to 30 September 2020 (the point where it has clear evidence Mr Y was told it would no longer be allowed).

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to review its processes to ensure that any changes to direct payments are clearly communicated and only take effect following a review.

  • Suffolk County Council (21 003 276)

    Category: Education Date: 02-Dec-2021

    Summary

    Mrs X complained that the Council failed to deal properly with her son’s Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan from when she moved into the area, resulting in loss of education. We have found that the Council was at fault in delaying reviewing the EHC Plan and failing to provide education and support. The Council has agreed a suitable remedy, including a payment for the loss of education.

    Service improvements

    The Council will provide evidence to the Ombudsman of its reminder to staff about recording communication with families and information about dealing with transfers of Education, Health and Care Plans from other local authorities.The Council will remind staff about the duty to consult the schools that parents ask to be named in their child's Education, Health and Care Plan, rather than making their own decision about the suitability of the school without consulting.

  • Suffolk County Council (21 002 940)

    Category: Adult care services Date: 17-Feb-2022

    Summary

    Mr X complained the Council changed and suspended his son, Mr Y’s, direct payments during 2020 without adequate communication or explanation. The Council was at fault for failing to pay Mr Y’s respite payment since 2020 despite it being an assessed care and support need. The Council agreed to apologise and pay Mr X a total of £500 to recognise the frustration, uncertainty, time and trouble and loss of opportunity that caused. It agreed to reinstate the respite payment. An administrative error also meant Mr Y did not receive his direct payment during October 2020. The Council has already apologised to Mr X and paid the missing amount which is a suitable remedy.

    Service improvements

    The Council agreed to remind staff to refer complainants to the Ombudsman in all final complaint responses. The referral should include details of how complainants can complain to us.

  • Suffolk County Council (21 002 326)

    Category: Education Date: 09-Mar-2022

    Summary

    Mr and Mrs X complain the Council failed to ensure appropriate education was provided to meet their son’s, Y’s, needs as set out in his Education, Health, and Care Plan. The Ombudsman finds the Council at fault for not properly considering its duties to provide alternative education. The Council will apologise to Mr and Mrs X and make a payment to reflect the injustice. The Council will also make improvements to its service.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to improve its process to assess whether children are receiving the correct provision.

  • Suffolk County Council (21 001 703)

    Category: Adult care services Date: 03-Mar-2022

    Summary

    Ms X complained that carers dropped her while lifting her using a hoist. She said the hoist strap was not securely attached. Ms X also complained about the way the Council responded to her complaint about the incident, and that it did not contact her for weeks afterwards. Ms X said being dropped caused her injury, and she is now reluctant to engage with care services because of a lack of trust. She also said the Council’s response made her feel dismissed. We find the Council at fault for the way it conducted its enquiry. This caused Ms X injustice because it denied her an opportunity to be involved in the process and give her version of events, and it caused uncertainty. The Council has agreed to apologise to Ms X and make improvements to its service.

    Service improvements

    the Council will remind staff (including management) to speak to the person who is the subject of a safeguarding referral or enquiry.the Council will remind staff (including management) to make sure they tell the person who is the subject of a safeguarding referral or enquiry the outcome, regardless of whether they are the person who made the referral.

  • Suffolk County Council (21 001 022)

    Category: Education Date: 23-Feb-2022

    Summary

    We upheld Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s failure to secure the provision in her daughter Y’s education, health and care plan. The Council agreed to apologise to Miss X and Y and make a payment to recognise Y’s lost provision.

    Service improvements

    The Council will remind officers that when arranging alternative provision the Council should ensure it records how it will arrange or secure the provision in a young person’s EHC plan.

  • Suffolk County Council (20 013 285)

    Category: Adult care services Date: 10-Sep-2021

    Summary

    Mr and Mrs X complained about the Council’s handling of the care charges for their adult son, Mr Y’s, attendance at a day centre. The Council was at fault as it failed to explain Mr Y would be required to contribute to his care costs when it arranged the care package. It then further delayed explaining the charges, failed to communicate clearly with Mr and Mrs X and failed to explain there would be a charge for non-attendance. The Council agreed to cancel the debt prior to April 2019, make a payment to Mr and Mrs X to acknowledge the frustration caused to them and review its processes to prevent a recurrence of the fault.

    Service improvements

    The Council agreed to review the way it communicates with people receiving adult social care services about charging and their potential contribution to the cost of care at the time it assesses their eligible needs, to avoid misunderstanding and confusion.

  • Suffolk County Council (20 012 908)

    Category: Education Date: 10-Oct-2021

    Summary

    The Council was at fault when it failed to issue an updated Education, Health and Care plan for Mr Y after a Tribunal hearing, and when it failed to secure the provision set out in that plan. This led to Mr Y missing the support he needed and caused his mother, Miss X, distress and frustration. The Council also wrongly transferred Mr Y’s Education, Health and Care plan to a neighbouring authority. This meant that Miss X had to pay for legal advice. The Council agreed to take the recommendations set out to remedy the injustice its actions caused to Miss X and Mr Y.

    Service improvements

    The Council will share this decision to the Council officers dealing with cases of this nature and emphasise the Council’s legal position when considering whether a child with no capacity is ordinarily resident in the Council’s area.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings