Service improvements

Northumberland County Council

Showing service improvements between 1 April 2024 and 31 March 2025

Find out more about service improvements

When we find fault, we can recommend improvements to systems and processes where they haven’t worked properly, so that others do not suffer from these same problems in future. Common examples are policy changes; procedural reviews; and staff training. Service improvements from decisions are published for 5 years and those from reports are published for 10 years.

Showing 1 - 4 of 4 cases with service improvements

Export results (CSV)

Downloads the current filtered list of service improvement decisions for Northumberland County Council as a CSV file.

  • Northumberland County Council (24 005 014)

    Category: Education Date: 13-Mar-2025

    Summary

    Mr X complained that the Council did not deal with his daughter Y’s education properly. The Council is at fault because it did not consider providing s19 alternative education provision. Mr X and Y suffered avoidable distress. Y suffered loss of educational provision. The Council should apologise, pay Mr X and Y £200 each for avoidable distress, pay Mr X £3,000 for missed educational provision and provide guidance to staff.

    Service improvements

    • Provide guidance to staff to consider any action required under the Council’s statutory duties when it becomes aware of non-attendance at schools, and to record all actions, communication and decision making as part of this consideration.

  • Northumberland County Council (24 000 306)

    Category: Education Date: 17-Sep-2024

    Summary

    The Council did not properly record its decision-making when deciding Mr B’s school transport appeals and it failed to provide sufficient detail in its decision letters. There was fault in the way the Council recorded its decision-making. Because of this, Mr B suffered uncertainty. The Council will apologise to Mr B, train staff, and offer Mr B a fresh appeal.

    Service improvements

    The Council will provide relevant staff training in making and recording decision-making and the importance of writing decision letters to ensure they give clear reasons for the decisions made. This will help to ensure it provides detailed reasons to people about the decisions it makes so there is a clear understanding about how the decision was reached.The Council will remind relevant staff of the importance of signposting to the Ombudsman at the end of the appeals procedure. This will help to ensure people know how they can escalate the matter further if they are unhappy.

  • Northumberland County Council (23 017 490)

    Category: Education Date: 06-Oct-2024

    Summary

    Ms Y has two sons who both have Education, Health and Care plans in place. Ms Y complained the Council has failed to implement the provision in either plan, and the Council accepted this to be true. We found the Council at fault and recommended the Council apologise, make a payment in acknowledgement of the injustice caused, and make service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council will consider the reasons for the delay in implementing the provision set out in the EHC plans and produce an action plan to ensure the issues are not repeated.The Council will consider the reasons for the delay in dealing with the complaint and produce an action plan to ensure the issues are not repeated.

  • Northumberland County Council (23 014 712)

    Category: Education Date: 03-Jul-2024

    Summary

    Ms X complained about how the Council funded her son’s education. The Council was at fault for failing to have suitable oversight of how it funded Z’s education and in how it decided to reduce Z’s funding. This allowed the funds to be misused and meant Z did not receive all the special educational provision he needed. The Council will review Z’s Education, Health and Care Plan, and put this Ombudsman’s decision to its family and children’s services overview and scrutiny committee.

    Service improvements

    The Council was at fault for failing to have suitable oversight of how it funded a young person's education and in how it decided to reduce the young person's funding. The Council will put the Ombudsman's decision to its family and children's services overview and scrutiny committee. This will allow the committee to consider the impact of poor oversight in this case, which led to the complainant misspending a large sum of money allocated for the education of a young person with special educational needs. The committee will also consider what steps are necessary to prevent the faults the Ombudsman identified from happening again. The Council will send the Ombudsman an action plan setting out the steps it will take as a result of the committee's consideration.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings