Service improvements

London Borough of Redbridge

Showing service improvements between 1 April 2025 and 31 March 2026

Find out more about service improvements

When we find fault, we can recommend improvements to systems and processes where they haven’t worked properly, so that others do not suffer from these same problems in future. Common examples are policy changes; procedural reviews; and staff training. Service improvements from decisions are published for 5 years and those from reports are published for 10 years.

Showing 1 - 10 of 20 cases with service improvements

Export results (CSV)

Downloads the current filtered list of service improvement decisions for London Borough of Redbridge as a CSV file.

  • London Borough of Redbridge (25 007 484)

    Category: Adult care services Date: 29-Jul-2025

    Summary

    The Council failed to properly assess the capacity of three family members to make a homelessness application when they told the Council they were suffering domestic abuse. The Council did not deal with the safeguarding referral appropriately or in good time, and did not offer the family social care needs assessments soon enough. It cannot show how it made the decision to offer a one-bedroom property and it took too long to deal with the complaint to it. The family missed out on interim accommodation, and they were caused distress and uncertainty. The Council has agreed to apologise, make symbolic payments to the family, and review their housing needs. It will also review its training and procedures on mental capacity assessment, arranging interpreters, and monitoring case progress.

    Service improvements

    The Council will share this decision with staff in homelessness, adult social care and complaint handling.The Council will review its procedure for arranging interpreters within adult social care and update relevant staff on this.The Council will review how it monitors and ensures progress where a safeguarding referral is closed on the basis that the risk is managed by Care Act assessments.

  • London Borough of Redbridge (24 022 800)

    Category: Housing Date: 08-Oct-2025

    Summary

    We have upheld Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his Right to Buy application. The Council accepts there was an error in the sale price used and has reinstated the offer, based on the valuation price. This puts Mr X back to the position he would have been in but for that error and further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

    Service improvements

    The Council will remind relevant staff to consider the Government Guidance on Right to Buy when making offers where the cost floor price is higher than the market valuation.

  • London Borough of Redbridge (24 021 597)

    Category: Housing Date: 12-Nov-2025

    Summary

    Mr B complained the Council delayed accepting a duty to house him and in providing him with accommodation, confused his application with his brother’s, suspended his housing register application and placed him in the wrong band. The Council wrongly registered Mr B’s homeless application in his brother’s name, failed to consider its discretionary power to provide interim accommodation, delayed providing temporary accommodation, delayed lifting the suspension on the housing register application and delayed referring his case to the medical adviser. That left Mr B with uncertainty about whether he missed out on accommodation and caused him distress. An apology, payment to Mr B, backdating of his priority and training for officers is satisfactory remedy.

    Service improvements

    The Council will carry out a training session for officers dealing with homeless applications to cover priority need, the circumstances in which the Council should provide interim accommodation and the Council’s discretionary powers to provide interim accommodation where a person is rough sleeping.

  • London Borough of Redbridge (24 020 173)

    Category: Education Date: 26-Jan-2026

    Summary

    Ms F complained about the Council’s handling of her daughter’s (X) education and transport to school. She said she experienced distress and uncertainty, and X had a loss of education and special educational needs provision. We found fault by the Council for causing delays in arranging some key EHC plan provision and school transport for X. The Council will apologise and make payment to acknowledge the impact its faults caused them. It also agreed to carry out service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council will review its Home to School Travel Assistance Policy to ensure it correctly applies the law and principles set out in case law (Dudley test) regarding the nearest suitable school for school transport decisions.The Council will remind staff involved in the Education, Health, and Care plans process and school travel assistance decisions about the criteria for the nearest suitable school for travel assistance purposes. Including, the Council’s duty is to provide transport for a child where the statutory criteria are met, and only one school is listed in Section I of a plan with no conditions attached.

  • London Borough of Redbridge (24 018 741)

    Category: Housing Date: 09-Jan-2026

    Summary

    The complaint is about the Council’s delay in moving Mr B and his family from unsuitable temporary accommodation. We find fault in the delay which was because of service failure. This meant the family lived (and continue to live) in unsuitable accommodation. The Council has agreed to our recommendations for actions to remedy the injustice.

    Service improvements

    The Council will review how it can improve its approach to searching for suitable properties when it finds an applicant is living in unsuitable accommodation, so it complies with its legal duties.

  • London Borough of Redbridge (24 018 072)

    Category: Transport and highways Date: 26-Nov-2025

    Summary

    Mr X complained on behalf of Mr Y the Council used the wrong date for the start of the period to challenge a Penalty Charge Notice by making formal representations. Mr X says this meant the Council would not accept any representations made by Mr Y as it said he was too late. We have found fault in the Council’s actions for failing to allow Mr Y’s representations. The Council has agreed to apologise to Mr Y, allow him to make representations to appeal the Notice, repay him the £205 he paid and make service improvements.

    Service improvements

    Review its procedure in relation to the date up until which representations can be provided to ensure it is in line with legislation and provide evidence it has done so.

  • London Borough of Redbridge (24 017 739)

    Category: Adult care services Date: 28-Sep-2025

    Summary

    Mrs Y complains about delays in the Disabled Facilities Grant (DFG) process which she says have caused significant distress. We find delay in the processing of Mrs Y’s DFG which the Council will acknowledge with an apology and a symbolic payment of £500. The Council will also progress Mrs Y’s DFG referral without further delay and create an action plan to help reduce delays in DFG processing.

    Service improvements

    Create an action plan with the aim of helping to reduce the significant delays in the Council's Disabled Facilities Grant processing times.

  • London Borough of Redbridge (24 017 686)

    Category: Adult care services Date: 21-Oct-2025

    Summary

    Ms C complains the Council commissioned care provider, Bio Luminuex Healthcare Ltd, failed to provide suitable care and falsified records. Ms C also complains the Council failed to provide proper support for her mother, Mrs D, after she left a care home. The Council is at fault for failing to properly assess Mrs D’s needs before she returned to the community and for inadequate services it commissioned. To put things right the Council has agreed to waive an existing invoice of over £1700, apologise to Mrs D and Ms C for the distress and frustration its actions caused; and make service improvements which include the quality monitoring of the care provider.

    Service improvements

    2. Within three months of the final decision the Council will:a) review why Mrs D did not receive an Occupational Therapy assessment before she went home and provide an action plan about how the Council will avoid this happening in the future;Within three months of the final decision the Council will: b) provide a reminder by way of a staff circular, team meeting or as part of formal training, to relevant officers about the importance of completing person centered support plans;Within three months of the final decision the Council will: c) provide a reminder by way of a staff circular, team meeting or as part of formal training, to relevant officers about the importance of recording interactions including telephone calls;Within three months of the final decision the Council will: d) provide an update on what actions the Council has taken about Bio Luminuex Healthcare Ltd to ensure it provides contracted services.

  • London Borough of Redbridge (24 017 062)

    Category: Housing Date: 27-Jul-2025

    Summary

    We found fault by the Council on Mr Y’s complaint about it placing him in unsuitable temporary accommodation. The Council accepted it was unsuitable but failed to move him. It also failed to show it properly assessed whether the accommodation was suitable before placing him in it. The Council agreed to apologise for the failings, pay £1,050 for the distress called, continue to pay £150 a month until he is moved to suitable accommodation or refuses a suitable offer, and remind relevant officers of the need to assess, and record, the suitability of accommodation before placing applicants in them. There was no fault on his complaint about it placing him the wrong Band under its allocation scheme.

    Service improvements

    The Council agreed to remind relevant officers of the need to assess the suitability of temporary accommodation for applicants before placing them in it and to retain a record of the assessment.

  • London Borough of Redbridge (24 016 722)

    Category: Housing Date: 21-Jul-2025

    Summary

    Mr X complained the Council delayed in dealing with his homelessness application and review request. We found the significant delays in dealing with dealing with Mr X’s homelessness application and review request are fault. As is the delay in providing temporary accommodation having determined Mr X was in priority need. These faults have caused Mr X difficulties and distress and meant he lived in his car for longer than he otherwise would have. The Council has agreed to apologise and make payments to Mr X and take action to address its delays.

    Service improvements

    The Council should produce an action plan to address the delays in dealing with applications and review requests caused by staff shortages, and any backlogs this has created.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings