Service improvements

Bury Metropolitan Borough Council

Showing service improvements between 1 April 2023 and 31 March 2024

Find out more about service improvements

When we find fault, we can recommend improvements to systems and processes where they haven’t worked properly, so that others do not suffer from these same problems in future. Common examples are policy changes; procedural reviews; and staff training. Service improvements from decisions are published for 5 years and those from reports are published for 10 years.

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 cases with service improvements

Export results (CSV)

Downloads the current filtered list of service improvement decisions for Bury Metropolitan Borough Council as a CSV file.

  • Bury Metropolitan Borough Council (22 014 364)

    Category: Adult care services Date: 06-Jun-2023

    Summary

    Mrs X complained that a care provider commissioned by the Council to support her adult daughter, Miss D, failed to properly investigate injuries to Miss D’s arms, prevented her from entering Miss D’s home pending the outcome of a safeguarding investigation in relation to another resident and disclosed information about the situation to a third party. We found the Council was at fault in that the care provider failed to keep Mrs X informed about Miss D’s injuries, delayed in collecting Miss D’s prescribed medication for the injuries and disclosed confidential information to a third party. In recognition of the injustice caused, the Council has agreed to apologise and make a symbolic payment.

    Service improvements

    The Council will ensure the Care Provider issues a reminder to all staff that family and other representatives must be kept updated and prescriptions should be collected in a timely fashion.

  • Bury Metropolitan Borough Council (21 006 547)

    Category: Adult care services Date: 26-Jul-2023

    Summary

    Mr X complains about a Section 117 after care package provided by the Council. The Council is at fault as Mr X did not consistently receive his full package of care. There is also no evidence to show the Council sent the wellbeing and recovery plans to Mr X. These faults caused uncertainty to Mr X which the Council has agreed to remedy by apologising and making a payment of £300 to him. There is no evidence to show the Council coerced Mr X into accepting a care package or that it failed to consider a request to increase his care package and request for a personal budget.

    Service improvements

    Review its record keeping to ensure it clearly records a patient’s decision to refuse section 117 after care and whether the Council is satisfied this was an informed decision. This is to ensure the Council has an audit trail of patients’ key decisions about section 117 after care.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings