Service improvements

Birmingham City Council

Showing service improvements between 1 April 2025 and 31 March 2026

Find out more about service improvements

When we find fault, we can recommend improvements to systems and processes where they haven’t worked properly, so that others do not suffer from these same problems in future. Common examples are policy changes; procedural reviews; and staff training. Service improvements from decisions are published for 5 years and those from reports are published for 10 years.

Showing 31 - 40 of 47 cases with service improvements

Export results (CSV)

Downloads the current filtered list of service improvement decisions for Birmingham City Council as a CSV file.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 013 089)

    Category: Housing Date: 11-Aug-2025

    Summary

    Mr B complained about the Council closing his housing applications. We find that the Council delayed assessing Mr B’s first application, closed his application as incomplete without specifying which documents he had not provided, and wrongly closed his second application as incomplete when he had provided all the necessary documents. This caused Mr B avoidable frustration and inconvenience. The Council has agreed to apologise, make a symbolic payment to Mr B and backdate his award and registration date.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to provide evidence to show that it no longer has a significant backlog in processing housing applications and carrying out reviews, and that it is assessing 95% of housing applications within eight weeks.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 013 075)

    Category: Housing Date: 07-Jul-2025

    Summary

    Miss B complained that the Council failed to properly backdate her housing priority award. We find that the Council failed to properly deal with Miss B’s homelessness application and delayed awarding Miss B additional priority on the Council’s housing register. The Council has agreed to apologise, backdate Miss B’s housing priority and makes a payment to Miss B. We have also recommended service improvements.

    Service improvements

    Provide training and/or guidance to its staff to ensure they are following the requirements of the Housing Act 1996 and the Homelessness Code of Guidance when dealing with homelessness applications. It should include the criteria for accepting subsequent homelessness applications, the requirement to issue decision letters, the timescales for the relief and prevention duties and the need to consider whether it is reasonable for the applicant to continue to occupy their accommodation.•Implement a monitoring system to ensure that cases are being handled within reasonable timeframes and that key deadlines (such as the decision on whether the relief duty applies) are met.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 012 924)

    Category: Housing Date: 24-Apr-2025

    Summary

    Mrs B complained about the Council’s decision to close her housing applications. We find that the Council wrongly decided her application was incomplete, despite her submitting all the required evidence. This caused avoidable frustration for Mrs B and delayed her ability to join the housing register. The Council has agreed to assess Mrs B’s application and, if she qualifies to join the register, it will backdate her award date. It has also agreed to apologise to Mrs B, make a symbolic payment to her, and carry out service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to review its procedures to ensure it checks which documents a housing applicant has already provided and does not base its decision on only the documents submitted with the latest application. It will also remind all officers that a thorough check of all documents previously provided should be undertaken.The Council has agreed to consider amending its procedures to give housing applicants additional time to submit missing documents before their application is closed, to prevent unnecessary delays. If it decides not to amend its procedures, it will amend the application form to include a clear warning about the consequences of not submitting all required evidence.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 012 812)

    Category: Housing Date: 05-May-2025

    Summary

    Mrs B complained about the Council’s decision to close her housing applications. We find that the Council failed to clearly communicate the consequences of not providing supporting documents, requested unnecessary evidence and then wrongly decided her application was incomplete, despite her submitting all the required evidence. This led to the closure of her applications which caused avoidable frustration for Mrs B and delayed her ability to join the housing register. The Council has agreed to assess Mrs B’s application and, if she qualifies to join the register, it will backdate her award date. It has also agreed to apologise to Mrs B, make a symbolic payment to her, and carry out service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to review the documents required for new housing applicants, joint tenants, existing tenants and household members, ensuring that applicants are not asked to provide unnecessary evidence. It will also ensure that staff training is provided so that officers are aware of the different evidence requirements for each applicant type.The Council has agreed to provide information to housing applicants on its website and its application form about the evidence it will accept as proof of address if they do not have a council tax bill or utility bill in their name.The Council has agreed to review its procedures to ensure it assesses applications which have been made in accordance with the allocation scheme. Unless the Council changes its allocation scheme, it should not consider applications to be incomplete when a transfer applicant has not provided evidence of their eligibility or when a member of the household has not provided documents.The Council has agreed to consider amending its procedures to give applicants additional time to submit missing documents before closing their applications, to prevent unnecessary delays. If the Council continues to close applications without giving applicants an opportunity to submit any missing documents, it will amend the application form to include a clear warning about the consequences of not submitting all required evidence.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 012 760)

    Category: Housing Date: 07-Aug-2025

    Summary

    Mr B complained about the accommodation the Council has provided since he and his family became homeless. We find that the Council failed to provide suitable accommodation. It placed the family in bed and breakfast accommodation for around 16 weeks, 10 weeks over the maximum time such accommodation can be used for homeless applicants with dependent children. The Council then placed the family in unsuitable accommodation, which is statutorily overcrowded and where they have to share facilities with other families. They have been living there for around 21 months. The Council has agreed to immediately move the family to suitable accommodation, apologise and make a payment to Mr B. It has also agreed to make service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to develop an action plan detailing the steps it will take to reduce delays in completing enquiries and determining what duty it owes to homeless applicants.The Council has agreed to provide us with a copy of its bed and breakfast elimination plan which details the actions it is taking to reduce the time families are staying in bed and breakfast accommodation.The Council has agreed to provide guidance to relevant officers about the way to respond to complaints about the suitability of interim or temporary accommodation, to ensure complainants are not deterred from requesting a review.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 012 230)

    Category: Benefits and tax Date: 28-May-2025

    Summary

    Ms X complained the Council took recovery action for council tax she did not owe for a property she previously lived in. She also complained its communication with her was poor. We found fault by the Council on both matters. As a result Ms X was caused unnecessary distress and inconvenience. The Council agreed to apologise to Ms X and make her a symbolic payment in recognition of the injustice caused.

    Service improvements

    The Council will ensure that emails to its council tax department receive an automated acknowledgement, so senders know they have been received. The automated acknowledgement should make clear that senders should call the council tax department if a matter is urgent.The Council will share a copy of this decision with council tax staff to identify learning from this complaint.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 012 178)

    Category: Housing Date: 05-May-2025

    Summary

    Miss B complained about the Council’s decision to close her housing applications. We find that the Council failed to clearly communicate the consequences of not providing supporting documents and failed to provide clear and consistent information about the documents Miss B needed to provide. This led to the closure of her applications which caused avoidable frustration for Miss B and delayed her ability to join the housing register. The Council has agreed to clearly specify which documents Miss B needs to provide and to then assess her application, backdating her award date if she qualifies to join the register. It has also agreed to apologise to Miss B, make a symbolic payment to her, and carry out service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to review the documents required for new housing applicants, joint tenants and household members, ensuring that applicants are not asked to provide unnecessary evidence. It will also ensure staff training is provided so that officers are aware of the different evidence requirements for each applicant type.The Council has agreed to ensure that housing applicants are clearly informed about which documents are required, with consistent information across the allocation scheme, website, application form and any correspondence.The Council has agreed to consider amending its procedures to give housing applicants additional time to submit missing documents before closing their applications, to prevent unnecessary delays. If the Council continues to close applications without giving applicants an opportunity to submit any missing documents, it will amend the application form to include a clear warning about the consequences of not submitting all required evidence.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 012 111)

    Category: Housing Date: 24-Apr-2025

    Summary

    Miss B complained about the Council’s decision to close her housing applications. We find that the Council failed to clearly communicate the consequences of not providing supporting documents, requested unnecessary evidence and then wrongly decided her application was incomplete, despite her submitting all the required evidence. This led to the closure of her applications which caused avoidable frustration for Miss B and delayed her ability to join the housing register. The Council has agreed to assess Miss B’s application and, if she qualifies to join the register, it will backdate her award date. It has also agreed to apologise to Miss B, make a symbolic payment to her, and carry out service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to review the documents required for new housing applicants and existing tenants, ensuring that applicants are not asked to provide unnecessary evidence. It will also ensure that staff training is provided to ensure that officers are aware of the different evidence requirements for each applicant type.The Council has agreed to review its procedures to ensure it assesses housing applications which have been made in accordance with the allocation scheme. Unless the Council changes its allocation scheme, it will not consider applications to be incomplete because a transfer applicant has not provided evidence of their eligibility.The Council has agreed to consider amending its procedures to give housing applicants additional time to submit missing documents before their application is closed, to prevent unnecessary delays. If it decides not to amend its procedures, it will amend the application form to include a clear warning about the consequences of not submitting all required evidence.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 010 957)

    Category: Education Date: 01-May-2025

    Summary

    Mrs X complained that the Council failed to make alternative education provision for her child and delayed in issuing an Education, Health and Care Plan for her. The Council was at fault as it did not consider if it had a duty to provide alternative education provision when Y struggled to attend school from September 2023, delayed in issuing Y’s final Education, Health and Care Plan and delayed in securing the speech and language therapy provision in the Plan. These faults caused distress and uncertainty to Mrs X and disadvantaged Y. The Council has agreed to remedy this injustice by apologising to Mrs X and making a symbolic payment of £1100 to acknowledge the distress caused to her and the disadvantage caused to Y.

    Service improvements

    Draw up an action plan, with timescales, setting out the action the Council will take to ensure it carries out the Education, Health and Care Plan process in accordance with the statutory timescales. This is to ensure the Council issues final Education, Health and Care Plans within the statutory timescales.By training or other means, remind officers of the Council’s duty to secure the special educational needs provision set out in an Education, Health and Care Plan from the date the final Plan is issued. This is to ensure the delays in delivering provision that occurred in Y’s case do not recur.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 010 085)

    Category: Education Date: 11-Jun-2025

    Summary

    Mr X complained about the Council’s handling of his son, Y’s Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan and annual reviews between 2023 and 2024. The Council was at fault. It failed to process an early annual review and then delayed issuing an amended Plan following a subsequent review. It also failed to provide sufficient oversight and delayed providing additional funding to the school after Mr X raised concerns about Y’s provision. There was also evidence of poor communication throughout. The Council agreed to make payments to Mr X to acknowledge the injustice caused to him and to recognise the impact it had on Y’s education.

    Service improvements

    The Council agreed to review its procedures around how it considers and decides requests from parents/carers and schools for early annual reviews of Education, Health and Care Plans. The Council should consider whether it is necessary to provide guidance to schools on how they can request an early review.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings