Service improvements

Birmingham City Council

Showing service improvements between 1 April 2025 and 31 March 2026

Find out more about service improvements

When we find fault, we can recommend improvements to systems and processes where they haven’t worked properly, so that others do not suffer from these same problems in future. Common examples are policy changes; procedural reviews; and staff training. Service improvements from decisions are published for 5 years and those from reports are published for 10 years.

Showing 21 - 25 of 25 cases with service improvements

Export results (CSV)

Downloads the current filtered list of service improvement decisions for Birmingham City Council as a CSV file.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 012 760)

    Category: Housing Date: 07-Aug-2025

    Summary

    Mr B complained about the accommodation the Council has provided since he and his family became homeless. We find that the Council failed to provide suitable accommodation. It placed the family in bed and breakfast accommodation for around 16 weeks, 10 weeks over the maximum time such accommodation can be used for homeless applicants with dependent children. The Council then placed the family in unsuitable accommodation, which is statutorily overcrowded and where they have to share facilities with other families. They have been living there for around 21 months. The Council has agreed to immediately move the family to suitable accommodation, apologise and make a payment to Mr B. It has also agreed to make service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to develop an action plan detailing the steps it will take to reduce delays in completing enquiries and determining what duty it owes to homeless applicants.The Council has agreed to provide us with a copy of its bed and breakfast elimination plan which details the actions it is taking to reduce the time families are staying in bed and breakfast accommodation.The Council has agreed to provide guidance to relevant officers about the way to respond to complaints about the suitability of interim or temporary accommodation, to ensure complainants are not deterred from requesting a review.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 012 178)

    Category: Housing Date: 05-May-2025

    Summary

    Miss B complained about the Council’s decision to close her housing applications. We find that the Council failed to clearly communicate the consequences of not providing supporting documents and failed to provide clear and consistent information about the documents Miss B needed to provide. This led to the closure of her applications which caused avoidable frustration for Miss B and delayed her ability to join the housing register. The Council has agreed to clearly specify which documents Miss B needs to provide and to then assess her application, backdating her award date if she qualifies to join the register. It has also agreed to apologise to Miss B, make a symbolic payment to her, and carry out service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to review the documents required for new housing applicants, joint tenants and household members, ensuring that applicants are not asked to provide unnecessary evidence. It will also ensure staff training is provided so that officers are aware of the different evidence requirements for each applicant type.The Council has agreed to ensure that housing applicants are clearly informed about which documents are required, with consistent information across the allocation scheme, website, application form and any correspondence.The Council has agreed to consider amending its procedures to give housing applicants additional time to submit missing documents before closing their applications, to prevent unnecessary delays. If the Council continues to close applications without giving applicants an opportunity to submit any missing documents, it will amend the application form to include a clear warning about the consequences of not submitting all required evidence.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 012 111)

    Category: Housing Date: 24-Apr-2025

    Summary

    Miss B complained about the Council’s decision to close her housing applications. We find that the Council failed to clearly communicate the consequences of not providing supporting documents, requested unnecessary evidence and then wrongly decided her application was incomplete, despite her submitting all the required evidence. This led to the closure of her applications which caused avoidable frustration for Miss B and delayed her ability to join the housing register. The Council has agreed to assess Miss B’s application and, if she qualifies to join the register, it will backdate her award date. It has also agreed to apologise to Miss B, make a symbolic payment to her, and carry out service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to review the documents required for new housing applicants and existing tenants, ensuring that applicants are not asked to provide unnecessary evidence. It will also ensure that staff training is provided to ensure that officers are aware of the different evidence requirements for each applicant type.The Council has agreed to review its procedures to ensure it assesses housing applications which have been made in accordance with the allocation scheme. Unless the Council changes its allocation scheme, it will not consider applications to be incomplete because a transfer applicant has not provided evidence of their eligibility.The Council has agreed to consider amending its procedures to give housing applicants additional time to submit missing documents before their application is closed, to prevent unnecessary delays. If it decides not to amend its procedures, it will amend the application form to include a clear warning about the consequences of not submitting all required evidence.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 009 625)

    Category: Housing Date: 04-Aug-2025

    Summary

    Mr B complained that the Council wrongly removed him from the housing register and failed to backdate his registration date when he rejoined. We find that the Council should not have removed Mr B from the housing register, delayed reviewing its decision and failed to properly consider information he provided about his homelessness. The Council’s actions caused Mr B significant distress and inconvenience and have left him with uncertainty about whether he would have successfully bid on housing if there had been no fault by the Council. The Council has agreed to apologise, make a payment to Mr B and backdate his registration date. It has also agreed to make service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to improve the clarity of information shared between housing and homelessness teams to ensure the housing team can clearly see when the homelessness team has decided an applicant is homeless, and therefore qualifies to join the housing register.The Council has agreed to remind officers that a person is homeless if they have no accommodation in the UK or elsewhere which is available for their occupation and which that person has a legal right to occupy.The Council has agreed to remind officers that councils should not consider it reasonable for a homelessness applicant to remain in their occupation until eviction by a bailiff.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 007 520)

    Category: Housing Date: 05-May-2025

    Summary

    Ms X complained about the way the Council handled her housing application. We find that the Council and Green Square Accord failed to tell Ms X that it was waiting for her to provide information, which led to her missing out on the offer of a property. When Green Square Accord later considered her application, it failed to follow a fair and transparent process which caused Ms X unnecessary distress. The Council has agreed to apologise and make a payment to Ms X. It has also agreed to make service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to ensure officers can record the actual reason a housing applicant has not been offered a property, and not just one from a pre-populated list.The Council has agreed to ensure Green Square Accord is aware that if it is considering an application from a Council nominated applicant, it must allocate the property in accordance with the nominations agreement.The Council has agreed to ask Green Square Accord to keep a record of all telephone contact with nominated housing applicants.The Council has agreed to consider improving its systems to allow better information sharing between Registered Providers and the Council.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings