Service improvements

Birmingham City Council

Showing service improvements between 1 April 2025 and 31 March 2026

Find out more about service improvements

When we find fault, we can recommend improvements to systems and processes where they haven’t worked properly, so that others do not suffer from these same problems in future. Common examples are policy changes; procedural reviews; and staff training. Service improvements from decisions are published for 5 years and those from reports are published for 10 years.

Showing 11 - 20 of 25 cases with service improvements

Export results (CSV)

Downloads the current filtered list of service improvement decisions for Birmingham City Council as a CSV file.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 014 372)

    Category: Housing Date: 08-Jun-2025

    Summary

    Miss B complained that the Council kept closing her housing applications. We found that the Council failed to clearly communicate the consequences of not providing supporting documents with her initial housing application, which led to its closure. The Council then closed the next two applications Miss B made, without properly explaining why it had done so. This caused Miss B avoidable frustration and inconvenience and delayed her ability to join the housing register. The Council has agreed to assesses Miss B’s application, and if she qualifies, it backdates her award date. The Council will also apologise, make a symbolic payment to Miss B and make service improvements.

    Service improvements

    •Provides further guidance to its staff about the information to provide in closure letters. It must ensure the letters specify exactly what information the applicant needs to provide. Where an applicant has provided financial records but more evidence is needed, it should not just list the financial documents applicants need to provide; it should explain why the evidence they have already provided does not meet the Council’s requirements.•Reviews its procedures to ensure it assesses applications which have been made in accordance with the allocation scheme. Unless the Council changes its allocation scheme, it should not consider applications to be incomplete when the applicant has provided the documents listed in paragraph 2.2.3 of the Council’s housing allocation scheme.•Resolves the technical issue which results in blank attachments being sent to housing applicants.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 014 164)

    Category: Housing Date: 15-Sep-2025

    Summary

    Miss B complained about the Council’s decision to close her housing application as incomplete. We find that the Council was wrong to close Miss B’s application because she had provided all the required information. This caused Miss B unnecessary frustration, worry and inconvenience. The Council has already apologised to Miss B. It has also agreed to make a symbolic payment to Miss B, backdate her registration date and make service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to amend its procedures to ensure officers are aware that documents other than utility or council tax bills can be used as proof of address, and of the circumstances when less than three months of bank statements should be accepted.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 014 063)

    Category: Housing Date: 16-Jul-2025

    Summary

    Mr B complained the Council failed to remedy damp and mould disrepair issues with his temporary accommodation, despite him regularly reporting his concerns to it for over a year. The Council was at fault for its delays in carrying out the repairs, carrying out an inspection, and making a new suitability decision; not treating Mr B’s repeated contacts as a trigger for a review of suitability; and not moving Mr B to a different property when the service co-ordinator decided he needed to be urgently rehoused. Because of the fault, Mr B suffered distress and frustration, and he remained living in poor conditions with his family for longer than they should have. The Council has agreed to apologise to Mr B, make a symbolic payment, and issue staff briefings.

    Service improvements

    The Council will identify and implement learning from this complaint to improve the time taken by the Council to address significant repairs. This will help to ensure similar failings do not happen in future and significant repairs are addressed by the Council in a timely manner.The Council will remind relevant staff of the Council’s duty to carry out an inspection when concerns about a property are raised by a service user. This will help to ensure inspections are not missed and property concerns do not go under the radar and be left unaddressed by the Council.The Council will remind relevant staff of the Council’s duty to keep suitability under review, and recognise the types of communications from service users which should trigger the Council to carry out a review of suitability. This will help to ensure suitability reviews are carried out when necessary.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 013 261)

    Category: Housing Date: 28-May-2025

    Summary

    Mr X complained about the Council’s decision to close the housing application made by his sister, Mrs B. We find that the Council wrongly decided Mrs B’s application was incomplete, despite her submitting all the required evidence. This caused avoidable frustration for Mrs B and delayed her ability to join the housing register. The Council has agreed to assess Mrs B’s application and backdate her award date if she qualifies to join the register. It has also agreed to apologise, make a symbolic payment to Mrs B and make service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to review the documents required for new applicants and existing tenants, ensuring that applicants are not asked to provide unnecessary evidence.The Council has agreed to review its procedures to ensure it assesses applications which have been made in accordance with the allocation scheme. Unless the Council changes its allocation scheme, it will not consider applications to be incomplete when the applicant has provided the documents listed in paragraph 2.2.3 of its housing allocation scheme.The Council has agreed to consider amending its procedures to give applicants additional time to submit missing documents before their application is closed, to prevent unnecessary delays. If the Council continues to close applications without giving applicants an opportunity to submit any missing documents, it will amend the application form to include a clear warning about the consequences of not submitting all required evidence.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 013 188)

    Category: Housing Date: 09-Jun-2025

    Summary

    Miss B complained about the Council’s decisions to close her housing applications. The Council failed to specify which documents she had not provided with her applications which caused avoidable frustration for Miss B. The Council also failed to make enquiries when Miss B was threatened with homelessness. This resulted in her not receiving the housing support she needed, which caused her unnecessary distress. The Council has agreed to apologise, make a symbolic payment to Miss B and take steps to improve its processes.

    Service improvements

    The Council will remind relevant staff that it must make enquiries when someone contacts it seeking accommodation and gives ‘reason to believe’ they ‘may be’ homeless or threatened with homelessness. The person does not have to complete a specific form or approach a particular department of the Council.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 013 128)

    Category: Housing Date: 11-Aug-2025

    Summary

    Ms B complained that the Council failed to consider evidence she provided to support her request for additional priority on the Council’s housing register. We find the Council failed to properly assess her housing needs. This caused Ms B frustration and inconvenience, as well as uncertainty about whether she could have moved to suitable accommodation by now if there had been no fault. The Council has agreed to carry out a proper assessment, apologise and make a payment to Ms B. It has also agreed to make service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to remind relevant officers to include their reasoning in housing priority decision letters.The Council has agreed to provide additional training and/or guidance to ensure its complaints officers can identify whether there are any outstanding reviewable decisions before responding to complaints about reviews. Alternatively, it should ensure its complaints officers check with the relevant team.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 013 089)

    Category: Housing Date: 11-Aug-2025

    Summary

    Mr B complained about the Council closing his housing applications. We find that the Council delayed assessing Mr B’s first application, closed his application as incomplete without specifying which documents he had not provided, and wrongly closed his second application as incomplete when he had provided all the necessary documents. This caused Mr B avoidable frustration and inconvenience. The Council has agreed to apologise, make a symbolic payment to Mr B and backdate his award and registration date.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to provide evidence to show that it no longer has a significant backlog in processing housing applications and carrying out reviews, and that it is assessing 95% of housing applications within eight weeks.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 013 075)

    Category: Housing Date: 07-Jul-2025

    Summary

    Miss B complained that the Council failed to properly backdate her housing priority award. We find that the Council failed to properly deal with Miss B’s homelessness application and delayed awarding Miss B additional priority on the Council’s housing register. The Council has agreed to apologise, backdate Miss B’s housing priority and makes a payment to Miss B. We have also recommended service improvements.

    Service improvements

    Provide training and/or guidance to its staff to ensure they are following the requirements of the Housing Act 1996 and the Homelessness Code of Guidance when dealing with homelessness applications. It should include the criteria for accepting subsequent homelessness applications, the requirement to issue decision letters, the timescales for the relief and prevention duties and the need to consider whether it is reasonable for the applicant to continue to occupy their accommodation.•Implement a monitoring system to ensure that cases are being handled within reasonable timeframes and that key deadlines (such as the decision on whether the relief duty applies) are met.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 012 924)

    Category: Housing Date: 24-Apr-2025

    Summary

    Mrs B complained about the Council’s decision to close her housing applications. We find that the Council wrongly decided her application was incomplete, despite her submitting all the required evidence. This caused avoidable frustration for Mrs B and delayed her ability to join the housing register. The Council has agreed to assess Mrs B’s application and, if she qualifies to join the register, it will backdate her award date. It has also agreed to apologise to Mrs B, make a symbolic payment to her, and carry out service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to review its procedures to ensure it checks which documents a housing applicant has already provided and does not base its decision on only the documents submitted with the latest application. It will also remind all officers that a thorough check of all documents previously provided should be undertaken.The Council has agreed to consider amending its procedures to give housing applicants additional time to submit missing documents before their application is closed, to prevent unnecessary delays. If it decides not to amend its procedures, it will amend the application form to include a clear warning about the consequences of not submitting all required evidence.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 012 812)

    Category: Housing Date: 05-May-2025

    Summary

    Mrs B complained about the Council’s decision to close her housing applications. We find that the Council failed to clearly communicate the consequences of not providing supporting documents, requested unnecessary evidence and then wrongly decided her application was incomplete, despite her submitting all the required evidence. This led to the closure of her applications which caused avoidable frustration for Mrs B and delayed her ability to join the housing register. The Council has agreed to assess Mrs B’s application and, if she qualifies to join the register, it will backdate her award date. It has also agreed to apologise to Mrs B, make a symbolic payment to her, and carry out service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to review the documents required for new housing applicants, joint tenants, existing tenants and household members, ensuring that applicants are not asked to provide unnecessary evidence. It will also ensure that staff training is provided so that officers are aware of the different evidence requirements for each applicant type.The Council has agreed to provide information to housing applicants on its website and its application form about the evidence it will accept as proof of address if they do not have a council tax bill or utility bill in their name.The Council has agreed to review its procedures to ensure it assesses applications which have been made in accordance with the allocation scheme. Unless the Council changes its allocation scheme, it should not consider applications to be incomplete when a transfer applicant has not provided evidence of their eligibility or when a member of the household has not provided documents.The Council has agreed to consider amending its procedures to give applicants additional time to submit missing documents before closing their applications, to prevent unnecessary delays. If the Council continues to close applications without giving applicants an opportunity to submit any missing documents, it will amend the application form to include a clear warning about the consequences of not submitting all required evidence.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings