Service improvements

Birmingham City Council

Showing service improvements between 1 April 2023 and 31 March 2024

Find out more about service improvements

When we find fault, we can recommend improvements to systems and processes where they haven’t worked properly, so that others do not suffer from these same problems in future. Common examples are policy changes; procedural reviews; and staff training. Service improvements from decisions are published for 5 years and those from reports are published for 10 years.

Showing 11 - 20 of 23 cases with service improvements

Export results (CSV)

Downloads the current filtered list of service improvement decisions for Birmingham City Council as a CSV file.

  • Birmingham City Council (22 017 327)

    Category: Housing Date: 04-Jul-2023

    Summary

    The Council accepts it acted with fault, resulting in Ms X spending too long in unsuitable temporary accommodation. It has offered a suitable remedy for the injustice this caused. However, the Council was also at fault for failing to keep the suitability of Ms X’s accommodation under review and delay completing the statutory review process. The Council has agreed to apologise, make a payment to Ms X and act to improve its services.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to ensure all letters accepting the main housing duty inform the applicant of their statutory right to review the suitability of the accommodation offered to meet that duty.The Council has agreed to remind relevant staff of the ongoing duty to keep the suitability of temporary accommodation under review, especially when there are reports of disrepair or other changes of circumstances which may affect suitability.The Council has agreed to remind relevant staff that any decision that despite disrepair or another change in circumstances, temporary accommodation remains suitable should be communicated in writing and set out the applicant’s statutory right to ask for a review of the decision under section 202 of the Housing Act 1996. It will create or amend any template letters as necessary.The Council has agreed to remind staff with responsibility for responding to complaints that when upholding a complaint, the response should set out what action the Council will take to remedy any injustice caused.

  • Birmingham City Council (22 016 386)

    Category: Housing Date: 01-Oct-2023

    Summary

    The Council delayed reviewing the decision it made to discharge its housing duty to Mrs X, and failed to inform Mrs X when it overturned the decision. It did not give Mrs X sufficient priority on its housing register and left Mrs X and her family living in severely overcrowded accommodation for over two years. The Council has recently moved the family to suitable accommodation and it has agreed to apologise and make a payment to Mrs X. It has also agreed to make service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to review its procedures for sharing information between all housing departments, such as the registration team, the temporary accommodation team and the homelessness team. When information is provided to one team, such as evidence to show that the applicant needs to add a child to their application, the evidence will be shared with other relevant teams to action accordingly.The Council has agreed to remind officers that they should record all decisions and respond to all correspondence.The Council has agreed to introduce a system to enable the Council to regularly check whether any reviews have not been completed, and that decision letters have been issued. This is to ensure reviews and decision letters are issued within the timescales set out in legislation.The Council has agreed to review the way it records the status of housing and homelessness applications, so that officers can easily see the status of an application, the date of any review requests and any review decisions.

  • Birmingham City Council (22 015 414)

    Category: Housing Date: 15-Aug-2023

    Summary

    there was significant fault in the Council’s decision to place Miss X and her young child in a bed and breakfast (B&B) hotel for ten weeks when she was homeless. This accommodation was unsuitable for her needs. She had already spent six weeks in a different B&B hotel at an earlier stage in the same homelessness application. There was also poor communication with Miss X about a proposed move to alternative temporary accommodation and a failure to inform her she had the right to request a review of the suitability of the accommodation. These faults caused serious injustice to Miss X who is vulnerable because of mental health issues. She also incurred extra costs while she was living in the B&B hotel. The Council has agreed to provide a suitable remedy.

    Service improvements

    The Council will use this complaint as a case study in a written briefing to officers to remind them:a) to complete a suitability assessment for every applicant before they make an offer of accommodation;b)to check which housing duty is owed before making an offer of accommodation to ensure applicants receive the correct letter and are informed of their right to request a review of the suitability of the accommodation where appropriate;c)to communicate clearly and keep applicants informed if there are any unforeseen delays in arranging a planned move to alternative temporary accommodation.

  • Birmingham City Council (22 014 892)

    Category: Housing Date: 03-Aug-2023

    Summary

    The Council delayed reviewing its decision that Mr B did not qualify to join the housing register, and it failed to properly consider his review request. The Council has agreed to carry out another review and take action to prevent similar failings in future.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to provide guidance to its officers about the minimum floor area of a bedroom, to ensure rooms under this size are disregarded when calculating overcrowding.

  • Birmingham City Council (22 013 941)

    Category: Housing Date: 09-Oct-2023

    Summary

    There was fault in the way the Council decided that Miss B did not qualify to join its housing register. This delayed Miss B moving to permanent accommodation. The Council has agreed to make a payment to Miss B and to take action to prevent similar failings in future.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to review the way it records information to ensure it is clear to officers assessing housing applications whether the applicant is owed a duty under part 7 of the Housing Act.

  • Birmingham City Council (22 013 847)

    Category: Housing Date: 07-Jun-2023

    Summary

    The Council delayed assessing Miss B’s housing application and then delayed reviewing its housing priority decision. The delays resulted in Miss B being given a later award date. The Council has agreed to apologise for the delays, backdate Miss B’s award date and take action to prevent similar failings in future.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to investigate the reasons for its delay in carrying out a mobility assessment and take action to prevent such delays in future.The Council has previously provided action plans to show the action it is taking to reduce delays in processing housing applications and review requests. The Council has agreed to provide an updated action plan, state how long it is currently taking to process housing applications and reviews and provide a report to show how the time it is taking has changed over the last year. If delays have not significantly reduced, it will explain the reason for this.

  • Birmingham City Council (22 013 282)

    Category: Housing Date: 11-Sep-2023

    Summary

    The Council failed to take a homelessness application from Miss B when she was threatened with homelessness. As a result, she was not provided with suitable temporary accommodation and was not able to join the Council’s housing register. The Council has agreed to apologise, make a payment to Miss B and establish if she has missed out on any properties as a result of the fault. If she has missed out on a property, the Council will offer Miss B the next available suitable property. The Council has also agreed to make service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to investigate why the Council’s records show that officers believed a ‘not homeless decision’ had been made, but a decision letter was not sent to the complainant. It will then take action to ensure this does not happen again.The Council has agreed to discuss this case with the officers involved to ensure they are aware of the failings identified and to prevent similar failings in future.The Council has agreed to remind officers dealing with approaches from people requiring housing assistance that they must consider whether there is reason to believe they may be homeless or threatened with homelessness, and where there is, they must make enquiries to see whether they owe them any duty under Part 7 of the Housing Act.The Council has agreed to remind officers dealing with approaches from people requiring housing assistance that they must consider whether there is reason to believe they may be homeless, eligible for assistance and have a priority need, and where there is, they must secure interim accommodation.

  • Birmingham City Council (22 011 528)

    Category: Housing Date: 01-May-2023

    Summary

    Miss X complained about how the Council managed her homelessness application and temporary accommodation during 2022. The Council was at fault. It failed to carry out a suitability assessment when it provided her with temporary accommodation which was unaffordable. It meant Miss X remained in unsuitable temporary accommodation for 9 months. It also failed to provide her with a housing officer and a personalised housing plan. The Council agreed to apologise to Miss X and provide her with a payment to acknowledge the time spent in unsuitable accommodation and the distress and uncertainty that caused.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to remind housing officers to carry out affordability assessments before placin people in temporary accommodation. The Council's letter offering should set out its reasons for considering the accommodation is suitable, including its reasons for deciding it is affordable. It should remind housing officers this is the Council’s responsibility and not the responsibility of housing providers.

  • Birmingham City Council (22 007 825)

    Category: Housing Date: 25-May-2023

    Summary

    The Council delayed assessing Mr B’s housing application and evidence which showed that he needed an adapted property to suit his mobility needs. The Council has agreed to offer Mr B the next suitable property he bids on. It has also agreed to make a payment to Mr B and to take action to prevent similar failings in future.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to remind staff of the importance of considering risk alert information to allow reasonable adjustments to be made.The Council has agreed to arrange training for the housing team on the Equality Act and the public sector equality duty, in order to further consolidate staff learning on equality considerations.The Council has agreed to investigate why a mobility report was not added to the housing record promptly and to take action to ensure reports are always added promptly in future.

  • Birmingham City Council (22 005 091)

    Category: Housing Date: 12-Jul-2023

    Summary

    Mr X complains the Council delayed reviewing the suitability of an offer of accommodation and its housing priority decision. The Council has accepted there were delays completing the reviews. Because of the delays, we find Mr X likely missed out on the offer of a Council property sooner than he did. He was caused significant distress and frustration during the delay. To remedy the injustice caused, the Council has agreed to apologise to Mr X, make him several payments, including for the period he was left in accommodation that was unsuitable for his disability-related needs, and make certain service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council will review its latest housing allocations policy and any relevant guidance to staff to make sure the process and evidence requirements for assessing banding based on the need to move due to the threat of violence or harassment are clear. This should include clear directions on when and what information should be confirmed with the Police about the potential threat and, if relevant, the circumstances when a risk assessment by the referral agency should be carried out. The Council has agreed to include information on the Home-Choice website to advise applicants that the housing assessment for exceptional need is informed by a risk assessment that is completed by the Police. The Council will circulate any updates made following the review of its Policy to relevant members of staff.The Council will circulate a reminder to relevant members of staff that all valid review requests, including those made by Council Officers by completing an exceptional need form, should be treated as such and progressed in line with its Housing Allocations Policy.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings