Service improvements

Birmingham City Council

Showing service improvements between 1 April 2022 and 31 March 2023

Find out more about service improvements

When we find fault, we can recommend improvements to systems and processes where they haven’t worked properly, so that others do not suffer from these same problems in future. Common examples are policy changes; procedural reviews; and staff training. Service improvements from decisions are published for 5 years and those from reports are published for 10 years.

Showing 1 - 5 of 5 cases with service improvements

Export results (CSV)

Downloads the current filtered list of service improvement decisions for Birmingham City Council as a CSV file.

  • Birmingham City Council (22 003 384)

    Category: Adult care services Date: 24-Nov-2022

    Summary

    there was fault in the way the Council considered Mr X’s request to move to an alternative residential care home. However we cannot say that Mr X would have moved sooner but for this fault. The Council’s handling of his case caused some inconvenience to his mother, Mrs Y, who was actively involved in planning his care.

    Service improvements

    Review its working practices to screen Care Match bids before they are forwarded to the client or their representative to ensure (a) they meet the person’s assessed care needs and (b) the person meets any of the provider’s admissions criteria relating to age, personal or nursing care or client group;Review the need for written advice to staff about searching for providers not currently registered on Care Match when the client has complex needs or is in a client group known to be particularly hard to place;Remind officers who investigate complaints about the importance of giving accurate information to service-users when they convey decisions about a request for a change of social worker.

  • Birmingham City Council (21 018 614)

    Category: Adult care services Date: 30-Jan-2023

    Summary

    We consider Birmingham City Council and Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust acted with fault when handling Mrs X’s request to better support her son’s Section 117 aftercare needs. That fault caused Mrs X time and trouble and caused Y uncertainty.

    Service improvements

    The Council should explain what action it has taken to ensure service users receive continuity of care, when their social worker takes extended leave.The Council should (jointly with the Trust and ICB) review the ‘S117 Mental Health Aftercare Funding ApplicationProcess’ and the Memorandum of Understanding. Each organisation should ensure those policies do notcontradict each other and ensure service users receiving PHBs for their Section117 aftercare do not experience similar fault.The Council should ensure relevant staff are aware of the local policy to assess/review PHBs for service users receiving Section 117 aftercare.

  • Birmingham City Council (21 012 352)

    Category: Adult care services Date: 07-Jul-2022

    Summary

    Mr D complained the Council transferred Ms E to a care home without a hospital discharge plan and without consultation with the family. We find the Council was at fault for not sharing copies of Ms E’s care plan and assessments with her family. It also delayed sending charging information to the family. The Council has agreed to our recommendations to address the injustice caused by fault.

    Service improvements

    The Council will issue written reminders to relevant staff to ensure they share care plans with service users and their relatives without unnecessary delay.The Council will issue written reminders to relevant staff to ensure they make a reasonable effort to involve a service user’s family in a review of their care and support needs.

  • Birmingham City Council (21 006 887)

    Category: Adult care services Date: 06-Apr-2022

    Summary

    Mr X complained about the way the Council dealt with a safeguarding report about his mother. We found there was fault in the Council’s actions that warranted a remedy. We also found fault in the way the Council responded to the complaint.

    Service improvements

    Consider whether the officers who dealt with the safeguarding alert in November 2020, and the late-night telephone call require further coaching or training.Review whether the Council's procedures are sufficient to ensure risk is properly considered and investigated in safeguarding cases such as these.

  • Birmingham City Council (20 012 501)

    Category: Adult care services Date: 05-May-2022

    Summary

    Ms C complains the Council failed to provide services to support her in caring for a family member. The Council is at fault for failing to carry out a carer’s assessment of Ms C’s needs and offering her support and advice about extra support that may be available to her. To remedy Ms C’s injustice the Council has agreed to apologise to Ms C, pay Ms C £1000, remind staff about the importance of offering or advising people about carer’s assessments and that support should be based on assessment.

    Service improvements

    remind staff about the importance of completing carer’s assessments and who is entitled to receive an assessment;remind staff that individual budgets should be based on a assessment not arbitrary financial limits.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings