Publicising planning applications
This fact sheet is aimed primarily at people who believe that the council has failed to advise them of a planning application that may affect them and may be considering making a complaint to the Ombudsman.
The council did not tell me about a planning application. Can the Ombudsman help me?
Yes, in some circumstances. If you believe that the council failed to tell you about a planning application and you were not able to object then you can complain to us.
But we are unlikely to uphold your complaint if it turns out that the council followed the proper procedures, relevant legislation and guidance on the publicity of applications; or if you were not directly affected by the development.
If you find out about a planning application and want to object, you should ask the council if you still have time to make an objection. If there is still time, you need to write to the council as soon as possible and say why you think the application should not be approved.
If the council tells you that the consultation period on the application has finished, you may be able to ask a councillor to contact council officers on your behalf about your concerns. If the application is being determined by a planning committee you should ask the council if you are able to present your objections at the meeting.
We cannot normally consider a complaint about an application until a decision has been made. This is because, even if a council has done something wrong, we do not know until that point whether the fault will affect the outcome.
There is no statutory requirement to publicise amendments to a planning application that are submitted before the application is decided. However, the Ombudsman takes the view that they should generally be subject to the same publicity procedure as the original application unless the amendments would not increase the impact on neighbours or others to whom the publicity was directed.
Councils do not have to publicise applications for very small changes to planning permissions, known as 'non-material amendments'. But they should publicise applications for more significant but still limited changes, referred to as 'minor material amendments'. We may consider how councils deal with both types of application. Government guidance encourages a proportionate approach taking into account who would be affected and the likely impact.
How do I complain?
The council’s policy should say how long it will take to respond. Our Complaint Handling Code says councils should have no more than two stages in a complaint process. The longest a complaint should take is 16 weeks.
The council should provide you with updates on your complaint, including when it may take longer to respond.
If your complaint is not making any progress, you can follow our top tips for making a complaint to find out what is happening.
If you complained more than 16 weeks ago, and you have not received a final response, we may be able to make enquiries about what is happening to your complaint. You should have tried to ask the council what is happening before contacting us about any delay.
If the council has sent you a final response (usually saying something like ‘this is our final response’) and you are unhappy with the outcome, you can complain to us.
You should normally make your complaint to us within 12 months of realising that the council has done something wrong.
If you can consider my complaint what will the Ombudsman look for?
We look at whether someone lost the chance to object, or speak at a committee. We will also consider whether a development would still have been approved, or if a planning permission might have been given with different conditions, if someone had made an objection. Depending on the council's procedures and the type of application, some faults we might find are that the council:
- did not send you a notification letter
- did not put up a site notice, or put a notice in a place where few people would see it
- wrongly described the development or gave inaccurate or misleading information about the application in its letters and site notices (for example ‘two storey’ instead of ‘three storey’)
- did not consult with other bodies when it should have done (for example, English Heritage, for listed buildings or Natural England, for wildlife conservation)
- did not consult you on amended plans that increased the impact of the development, or
- failed to correctly publish information about a planning application on its website.
What happens if the Ombudsman finds that the council was at fault?
It depends on the fault and what the consequences have been for you. We cannot force the council to overturn the planning decision or remove the development.
If other people put objections that were considered and were similar to the one you would have made if you had known about the application, we are unlikely to take action. But:
- If you were directly affected and your objection would probably have led to a better outcome, we may ask the council to:
- take other steps, such as asking the developer if they are willing to make changes to the permitted scheme, if not yet built
- pay for measures to reduce the impact of the development, or
- in exceptional cases, where it is not possible to remedy the problem, we may ask the council to pay you a financial remedy.
If we find fault with the council’s procedures, we will often recommend that the council introduces changes so that the same problem does not occur again in the future.
Examples of some complaints we have considered
Mrs X complained the council did not tell her about later planning applications for a neighbouring development, after the council refused planning permission following the first application. This meant Mrs X did not have the chance to object to the redesigned scheme, which she felt would negatively impact her privacy and amenity.
The council apologised for failing to notify Mrs X about the later applications. However, we could not say she had been caused a significant personal injustice as a result of this error, as it was unlikely the outcome of the planning application was affected by it. This is because the council did take account of the material planning considerations, including the impact on Mrs X’s amenity, before granting permission.
Mr X complained the council failed to properly publicise an application, which meant he had less time to comment on the proposal.
But even if the council did not publicise the application as it should have, this did not cause Mr X a significant injustice. He was aware of the application and had the opportunity to submit his comments. The case officer’s report referred to Mr X’s objections and addressed the concerns he raised. The officer was entitled to use his professional judgement to decide the development would not have a detrimental impact on Mr X’s amenity. It was unlikely the application outcome would have been different even if Mr X had more time to prepare his objections.
Other sources of information
- For advice on a range of planning topics go to https://www.planningportal.co.uk
- You can also contact Planning Aid at RTPI | Planning Advice
- Royal Town Planning Institute provides information about advice and consultancy www.rtpi.org.uk
- Gov.uk’sPlanning practice guidance - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
- Your local council’s website usually provides some information about its planning and enforcement service.
Our fact sheets give some general information about the most common type of complaints we receive but they cannot cover every situation. If you are not sure whether we can look into your complaint, please contact us.
September 2025