Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

New Report out now: Equal Access for people with disabilities

"Don't wait to be asked". We've published a new report helping councils, and other local services, to meet their duties under the Equality Act to anticipate the needs of people with disabilities in accessing their services.

Council agrees to refund care costs for some people in short-term residential care

Lincolnshire County Council has agreed to refund some people it charged for short-term residential care following an investigation by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.

The Ombudsman’s investigation found the council had been charging a fixed fee for respite care without assessing whether people could afford it. This is not in line with statutory guidance which emphasises the principle that a charge should be affordable for the individual.

The policy criticised by the Ombudsman saw a different flat rate charged for the care based on people’s ages, but stated people could have a full financial assessment if they wished.

The council told the Ombudsman it had identified 4,387 respite users who later went on to receive full-time residential care. Of that number, nearly 3,000 had either paid the correct charge or had underpaid. However, the rest had overpaid by between £10 and £50 per episode of respite care.

Although there was no individual complainant in this case, the Ombudsman used its powers to investigate whether other people may have been affected, after the issue was uncovered as part of a previous investigation.

Michael King, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, said:

“Although to some the amounts people overpaid may seem small, those people have still suffered a financial loss. These sums may have made a material difference to peoples’ weekly income, so I welcome the council’s acceptance of my recommendations to put things right for them.”

The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman’s role is to remedy injustice and share learning from investigations to help improve public, and adult social care, services. It has the power to make recommendations to improve processes for the wider public. In this case the council has agreed to reimburse those people it has already identified as having overcharged; and identify and reimburse the remaining cases (for people who are still alive). If this is not possible, it will offer those people a retrospective financial assessment and calculate any refunds due.

Article date: 16 March 2021